From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/8] xfstests: add a new test that runs fsstress under ENOSPC conditions Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2011 17:06:35 -0400 Message-ID: <20111102210635.GA20955@infradead.org> References: <1319849297-3506-1-git-send-email-dmonakhov@openvz.org> <1319849297-3506-8-git-send-email-dmonakhov@openvz.org> <20111102195357.GA22500@infradead.org> <8739e6z2gb.fsf@dmbot.sw.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Christoph Hellwig , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com, hch@lst.de, aelder@sgi.com To: Dmitry Monakhov Return-path: Received: from 173-166-109-252-newengland.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([173.166.109.252]:53654 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752556Ab1KBVGh (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Nov 2011 17:06:37 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <8739e6z2gb.fsf@dmbot.sw.ru> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, Nov 03, 2011 at 12:36:36AM +0400, Dmitry Monakhov wrote: > Strange... this means that parent process died unexpectedly. > Works fine fore me. In my case this happen once due to unknown > options(new opt " -fsetattr=1" passed to fsstress explicitly) because i've > forget to rebuilt fsstress via make. Can you please explicitly rebuild, > and check one more time to be 100% sure. Oh, looks like it wanted the setattr option. I held back all the new features for now until we figure if we want them for existing tests. I've applied and pushed out the first three patches for now, the others should follow as soon as I've decided on what to do with new operations.