From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] xfstests 264: add a copy and reserve test Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2011 02:55:25 -0400 Message-ID: <20111103065525.GA6800@infradead.org> References: <4EB20505.7070005@cn.fujitsu.com> <4EB205C7.6010906@cn.fujitsu.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Linux Btrfs , xfs@oss.sgi.com To: WuBo Return-path: Received: from 173-166-109-252-newengland.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([173.166.109.252]:55584 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751572Ab1KCGz1 (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Nov 2011 02:55:27 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4EB205C7.6010906@cn.fujitsu.com> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, Nov 03, 2011 at 11:08:55AM +0800, WuBo wrote: > This test is a stress test. It creates a set of threads for coping small files > into disk. I use a 2G disk for test, the ENOSPC arises usually but the disk is > not full under kenerl 3.0 with intel64. It seems like you really want to use _scratch_mkfs_sized instead of the btrfs-specific resize option and make the test generic. Also we already have used up these test numbers in the xfstests-dev repository, and I will commit another batch of tests today.