From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/9] xfstests: add a new test that runs fsstress under ENOSPC conditions Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2011 12:04:46 -0500 Message-ID: <20111108170446.GA17399@infradead.org> References: <1320342953-7973-1-git-send-email-dmonakhov@openvz.org> <1320342953-7973-6-git-send-email-dmonakhov@openvz.org> <20111107132533.GP12759@twin.jikos.cz> <87sjm0kqjk.fsf@dmbot.sw.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: dave@jikos.cz, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, aelder@sgi.com, tytso@mit.edu, hch@lst.de, xfs@oss.sgi.com To: Dmitry Monakhov Return-path: Received: from 173-166-109-252-newengland.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([173.166.109.252]:54949 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756185Ab1KHREv (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Nov 2011 12:04:51 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87sjm0kqjk.fsf@dmbot.sw.ru> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, Nov 07, 2011 at 05:31:11PM +0400, Dmitry Monakhov wrote: > Have you recompile fsstress via make? > test explicitly want use new feature "-f setattr=1" Btw, one useful thing for these patches would be to clearly error out if fsstress does't recognize the option.