From: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@canonical.com>
To: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>,
Josh Boyer <jwboyer@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.com>,
Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org>,
ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vfs: Correctly set the dir i_mutex lockdep class
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 09:28:49 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111110152848.GA5421@boyd> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111110143319.GB26644@quack.suse.cz>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2743 bytes --]
On 2011-11-10 15:33:19, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Thu 10-11-11 00:45:00, Tyler Hicks wrote:
> > 9a7aa12f3911853a introduced additional logic around setting the i_mutex
> > lockdep class for directory inodes. The idea was that some filesystems
> > may want their own special lockdep class for different directory
> > inodes and calling unlock_new_inode() should not clobber one of
> > those special classes.
> >
> > I believe that the added conditional, around the *negated* return value
> > of lockdep_match_class(), caused directory inodes to be placed in the
> > wrong lockdep class.
> >
> > inode_init_always() sets the i_mutex lockdep class with i_mutex_key for
> > all inodes. If the filesystem did not change the class during inode
> > initialization, then the conditional mentioned above was false and the
> > directory inode was incorrectly left in the non-directory lockdep class.
> > If the filesystem did set a special lockdep class, then the conditional
> > mentioned above was true and that class was clobbered with
> > i_mutex_dir_key.
> >
> > This patch removes the negation from the conditional so that the i_mutex
> > lockdep class is properly set for directory inodes. Special classes are
> > preserved and directory inodes with unmodified classes are set with
> > i_mutex_dir_key.
> Duh, you are right. I wonder how come this did not trigger any lockdep
> messages during my testing with ocfs2 for which I wrote the patch...
Good question. Adding the ocfs2 maintainers and devel list to cc, as
this patch is likely to change up their lockdep warnings.
I expect this will also solve many of the lockdep issues around the
order of i_mutex and mmap_sem being taken in files verse directories.
That's why I stumbled across it.
>
> Anyway, thanks for catching this! You can add
> Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Thanks for the review!
Tyler
>
> Honza
> > Signed-off-by: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@canonical.com>
> > ---
> > fs/inode.c | 3 +--
> > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/inode.c b/fs/inode.c
> > index ee4e66b..9d01a0d 100644
> > --- a/fs/inode.c
> > +++ b/fs/inode.c
> > @@ -855,8 +855,7 @@ void lockdep_annotate_inode_mutex_key(struct inode *inode)
> > struct file_system_type *type = inode->i_sb->s_type;
> >
> > /* Set new key only if filesystem hasn't already changed it */
> > - if (!lockdep_match_class(&inode->i_mutex,
> > - &type->i_mutex_key)) {
> > + if (lockdep_match_class(&inode->i_mutex, &type->i_mutex_key)) {
> > /*
> > * ensure nobody is actually holding i_mutex
> > */
> > --
> > 1.7.5.4
> >
> --
> Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
> SUSE Labs, CR
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-11-10 15:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-11-10 6:45 [PATCH] vfs: Correctly set the dir i_mutex lockdep class Tyler Hicks
2011-11-10 14:33 ` Jan Kara
2011-11-10 15:28 ` Tyler Hicks [this message]
2011-11-17 8:35 ` Joel Becker
2011-12-12 16:02 ` [PATCH][RESEND] " Tyler Hicks
2012-01-20 18:39 ` [PATCH][BUGFIX][RESEND] " Tyler Hicks
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20111110152848.GA5421@boyd \
--to=tyhicks@canonical.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=jlbec@evilplan.org \
--cc=john.johansen@canonical.com \
--cc=jwboyer@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mfasheh@suse.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).