From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] fs: Make write(2) interruptible by a signal
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 15:13:05 -0500
Message-ID: <20111114201305.GB29277@infradead.org>
References: <1321287324-15121-1-git-send-email-jack@suse.cz>
 <1321287324-15121-3-git-send-email-jack@suse.cz>
 <20111114162600.GB6989@infradead.org>
 <20111114164647.GP5230@quack.suse.cz>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
To: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Return-path: <linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from 173-166-109-252-newengland.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([173.166.109.252]:60167
	"EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK)
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754491Ab1KNUNM (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 14 Nov 2011 15:13:12 -0500
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20111114164647.GP5230@quack.suse.cz>
Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org>

On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 05:46:47PM +0100, Jan Kara wrote:
> There can be loops where the only blocking point is in
> balance_dirty_pages() and then using the return value makes sense but
> I think such loops would be in minority so maybe the return value doesn't
> make much sense after all.

Yes, maybe the return value isn't that smart.  Sorry for all the noise.