From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] btrfs: lower the dirty balance poll interval
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2011 10:21:57 +0800
Message-ID: <20111122022157.GB20982@localhost>
References: <20111117122403.GA32363@localhost>
 <20111121203614.GE28259@shiny>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
To: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20111121203614.GE28259@shiny>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org

On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 04:36:14AM +0800, Chris Mason wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 08:24:03PM +0800, Wu Fengguang wrote:
> > Tests show that the original large intervals can easily make the dirty
> > limit exceeded on 100 concurrent dd's. So adapt to as large as the
> > next check point selected by the dirty throttling algorithm.
> 
> Thanks Wu, were you planning on pushing this through your tree or should
> I take it?

Will you take it please?

Thanks,
Fengguang