linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
To: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: "linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] writeback: fix dirtied pages accounting on sub-page writes
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2011 17:21:11 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111122092110.GB12864@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111122001127.GG4017@quack.suse.cz>

On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 08:11:27AM +0800, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Mon 21-11-11 21:03:45, Wu Fengguang wrote:
> > When dd in 512bytes, generic_perform_write() calls
> > balance_dirty_pages_ratelimited() 8 times for the same page, but
> > obviously the page is only dirtied once.
> > 
> > Fix it by accounting nr_dirtied at page dirty time.
>   Well, but after this change, the interface balance_dirty_ratelimited_nr()
> is strange because the argument is only used for per-CPU ratelimiting and
> not for per-task ratelimiting...

Yeah I was vaguely aware of this... and still choose to ignore this
since the patchset looked already forbiddingly large at the time ;)

> So if you do this switch then I'd also
> switch bdp_ratelimits to get consistent results and a clean interface and
> completely kill balance_dirty_pages_ratelimited_nr().

Following your suggestions to change ratelimiting as well :)

I'll do the interface change with a standalone patch.

Thanks,
Fengguang
---
Subject: writeback: fix dirtied pages accounting on sub-page writes
Date: Thu Apr 14 07:52:37 CST 2011

When dd in 512bytes, generic_perform_write() calls
balance_dirty_pages_ratelimited() 8 times for the same page, but
obviously the page is only dirtied once.

Fix it by accounting tsk->nr_dirtied and bdp_ratelimits at page dirty time.

Signed-off-by: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
---
 mm/page-writeback.c |   13 +++++--------
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

--- linux-next.orig/mm/page-writeback.c	2011-11-22 16:59:48.000000000 +0800
+++ linux-next/mm/page-writeback.c	2011-11-22 17:12:20.000000000 +0800
@@ -1231,8 +1231,6 @@ void balance_dirty_pages_ratelimited_nr(
 	if (bdi->dirty_exceeded)
 		ratelimit = min(ratelimit, 32 >> (PAGE_SHIFT - 10));
 
-	current->nr_dirtied += nr_pages_dirtied;
-
 	preempt_disable();
 	/*
 	 * This prevents one CPU to accumulate too many dirtied pages without
@@ -1243,12 +1241,9 @@ void balance_dirty_pages_ratelimited_nr(
 	p =  &__get_cpu_var(bdp_ratelimits);
 	if (unlikely(current->nr_dirtied >= ratelimit))
 		*p = 0;
-	else {
-		*p += nr_pages_dirtied;
-		if (unlikely(*p >= ratelimit_pages)) {
-			*p = 0;
-			ratelimit = 0;
-		}
+	else if (unlikely(*p >= ratelimit_pages)) {
+		*p = 0;
+		ratelimit = 0;
 	}
 	/*
 	 * Pick up the dirtied pages by the exited tasks. This avoids lots of
@@ -1743,6 +1738,8 @@ void account_page_dirtied(struct page *p
 		__inc_bdi_stat(mapping->backing_dev_info, BDI_DIRTIED);
 		task_dirty_inc(current);
 		task_io_account_write(PAGE_CACHE_SIZE);
+		current->nr_dirtied++;
+		__get_cpu_var(bdp_ratelimits)++;
 	}
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(account_page_dirtied);

  reply	other threads:[~2011-11-22  9:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-11-21 13:03 [PATCH 0/5] dirty throttling bits for 3.3 Wu Fengguang
2011-11-21 13:03 ` [PATCH 1/5] writeback: balanced_rate cannot exceed write bandwidth Wu Fengguang
2011-11-21 22:50   ` Jan Kara
2011-11-22  6:41     ` Wu Fengguang
2011-11-22 21:04       ` Jan Kara
2011-11-23 13:17         ` Wu Fengguang
2011-11-21 13:03 ` [PATCH 2/5] writeback: charge leaked page dirties to active tasks Wu Fengguang
2011-11-21 21:49   ` Andrew Morton
2011-11-21 23:46     ` Jan Kara
2011-11-22 13:35     ` Wu Fengguang
2011-11-21 13:03 ` [PATCH 3/5] writeback: fix dirtied pages accounting on sub-page writes Wu Fengguang
2011-11-22  0:11   ` Jan Kara
2011-11-22  9:21     ` Wu Fengguang [this message]
2011-11-22 12:21       ` Jan Kara
2011-11-22 12:30         ` Wu Fengguang
2011-11-22 12:48           ` Jan Kara
2011-11-22 13:02             ` Wu Fengguang
2011-11-22 12:57         ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-11-22 13:07           ` Wu Fengguang
2011-11-22 13:41             ` Wu Fengguang
2011-11-22 13:53               ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-11-22 14:11                 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-11-28 13:51         ` Wu Fengguang
2011-11-21 13:03 ` [PATCH 4/5] writeback: fix dirtied pages accounting on redirty Wu Fengguang
2011-11-21 21:51   ` Andrew Morton
2011-11-22 13:59     ` Wu Fengguang
2011-11-21 13:03 ` [PATCH 5/5] writeback: dirty ratelimit - think time compensation Wu Fengguang
2011-11-23 12:44 ` [PATCH 0/5] dirty throttling bits for 3.3 Peter Zijlstra
2011-11-28 13:56   ` Wu Fengguang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20111122092110.GB12864@localhost \
    --to=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).