From: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
To: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: "linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] writeback: fix dirtied pages accounting on sub-page writes
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2011 17:21:11 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111122092110.GB12864@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111122001127.GG4017@quack.suse.cz>
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 08:11:27AM +0800, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Mon 21-11-11 21:03:45, Wu Fengguang wrote:
> > When dd in 512bytes, generic_perform_write() calls
> > balance_dirty_pages_ratelimited() 8 times for the same page, but
> > obviously the page is only dirtied once.
> >
> > Fix it by accounting nr_dirtied at page dirty time.
> Well, but after this change, the interface balance_dirty_ratelimited_nr()
> is strange because the argument is only used for per-CPU ratelimiting and
> not for per-task ratelimiting...
Yeah I was vaguely aware of this... and still choose to ignore this
since the patchset looked already forbiddingly large at the time ;)
> So if you do this switch then I'd also
> switch bdp_ratelimits to get consistent results and a clean interface and
> completely kill balance_dirty_pages_ratelimited_nr().
Following your suggestions to change ratelimiting as well :)
I'll do the interface change with a standalone patch.
Thanks,
Fengguang
---
Subject: writeback: fix dirtied pages accounting on sub-page writes
Date: Thu Apr 14 07:52:37 CST 2011
When dd in 512bytes, generic_perform_write() calls
balance_dirty_pages_ratelimited() 8 times for the same page, but
obviously the page is only dirtied once.
Fix it by accounting tsk->nr_dirtied and bdp_ratelimits at page dirty time.
Signed-off-by: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
---
mm/page-writeback.c | 13 +++++--------
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
--- linux-next.orig/mm/page-writeback.c 2011-11-22 16:59:48.000000000 +0800
+++ linux-next/mm/page-writeback.c 2011-11-22 17:12:20.000000000 +0800
@@ -1231,8 +1231,6 @@ void balance_dirty_pages_ratelimited_nr(
if (bdi->dirty_exceeded)
ratelimit = min(ratelimit, 32 >> (PAGE_SHIFT - 10));
- current->nr_dirtied += nr_pages_dirtied;
-
preempt_disable();
/*
* This prevents one CPU to accumulate too many dirtied pages without
@@ -1243,12 +1241,9 @@ void balance_dirty_pages_ratelimited_nr(
p = &__get_cpu_var(bdp_ratelimits);
if (unlikely(current->nr_dirtied >= ratelimit))
*p = 0;
- else {
- *p += nr_pages_dirtied;
- if (unlikely(*p >= ratelimit_pages)) {
- *p = 0;
- ratelimit = 0;
- }
+ else if (unlikely(*p >= ratelimit_pages)) {
+ *p = 0;
+ ratelimit = 0;
}
/*
* Pick up the dirtied pages by the exited tasks. This avoids lots of
@@ -1743,6 +1738,8 @@ void account_page_dirtied(struct page *p
__inc_bdi_stat(mapping->backing_dev_info, BDI_DIRTIED);
task_dirty_inc(current);
task_io_account_write(PAGE_CACHE_SIZE);
+ current->nr_dirtied++;
+ __get_cpu_var(bdp_ratelimits)++;
}
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(account_page_dirtied);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-11-22 9:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-11-21 13:03 [PATCH 0/5] dirty throttling bits for 3.3 Wu Fengguang
2011-11-21 13:03 ` [PATCH 1/5] writeback: balanced_rate cannot exceed write bandwidth Wu Fengguang
2011-11-21 22:50 ` Jan Kara
2011-11-22 6:41 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-11-22 21:04 ` Jan Kara
2011-11-23 13:17 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-11-21 13:03 ` [PATCH 2/5] writeback: charge leaked page dirties to active tasks Wu Fengguang
2011-11-21 21:49 ` Andrew Morton
2011-11-21 23:46 ` Jan Kara
2011-11-22 13:35 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-11-21 13:03 ` [PATCH 3/5] writeback: fix dirtied pages accounting on sub-page writes Wu Fengguang
2011-11-22 0:11 ` Jan Kara
2011-11-22 9:21 ` Wu Fengguang [this message]
2011-11-22 12:21 ` Jan Kara
2011-11-22 12:30 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-11-22 12:48 ` Jan Kara
2011-11-22 13:02 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-11-22 12:57 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-11-22 13:07 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-11-22 13:41 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-11-22 13:53 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-11-22 14:11 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-11-28 13:51 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-11-21 13:03 ` [PATCH 4/5] writeback: fix dirtied pages accounting on redirty Wu Fengguang
2011-11-21 21:51 ` Andrew Morton
2011-11-22 13:59 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-11-21 13:03 ` [PATCH 5/5] writeback: dirty ratelimit - think time compensation Wu Fengguang
2011-11-23 12:44 ` [PATCH 0/5] dirty throttling bits for 3.3 Peter Zijlstra
2011-11-28 13:56 ` Wu Fengguang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20111122092110.GB12864@localhost \
--to=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).