From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alasdair G Kergon Subject: Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH] deadlock with suspend and quotas Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2011 13:18:11 +0000 Message-ID: <20111129131811.GS7595@agk-dp.fab.redhat.com> References: <20111128150400.GE6366@quack.suse.cz> <20111129101901.GA5635@quack.suse.cz> <20111129102156.GA7463@quack.suse.cz> <20111129111136.GC5635@quack.suse.cz> <20111129130913.GE5635@quack.suse.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Mikulas Patocka , esandeen@redhat.com, Surbhi Palande , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dm-devel@redhat.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Christopher Chaltain , Valerie Aurora To: Jan Kara Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:7248 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754127Ab1K2NSp (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Nov 2011 08:18:45 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20111129130913.GE5635@quack.suse.cz> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 02:09:13PM +0100, Jan Kara wrote: > Hmm, then why do these operations suspend the filesystem if they > apparently don't need it? Sorry for my ignorance, I never seriously worked > with LVM code... They don't suspend it if they don't need to. dm-ioctl.h: /* * Set this to avoid attempting to freeze any filesystem when suspending. */ #define DM_SKIP_LOCKFS_FLAG (1 << 10) /* In */ Alasdair