From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Wu Fengguang Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/9] readahead: basic support for backwards prefetching Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2011 08:37:16 +0800 Message-ID: <20111130003716.GA11147@localhost> References: <20111129130900.628549879@intel.com> <20111129131456.925952168@intel.com> <20111129153552.GP5635@quack.suse.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Andrew Morton , Andi Kleen , "Li, Shaohua" , Linux Memory Management List , "linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" , LKML To: Jan Kara Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20111129153552.GP5635@quack.suse.cz> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org (snip) > > @@ -676,6 +677,20 @@ ondemand_readahead(struct address_space > > } > > > > /* > > + * backwards reading > > + */ > > + if (offset < ra->start && offset + req_size >= ra->start) { > > + ra->pattern = RA_PATTERN_BACKWARDS; > > + ra->size = get_next_ra_size(ra, max); > > + max = ra->start; > > + if (ra->size > max) > > + ra->size = max; > > + ra->async_size = 0; > > + ra->start -= ra->size; > IMHO much more obvious way to write this is: > ra->size = get_next_ra_size(ra, max); > if (ra->size > ra->start) { > ra->size = ra->start; > ra->start = 0; > } else > ra->start -= ra->size; Good idea! Here is the updated code: /* * backwards reading */ if (offset < ra->start && offset + req_size >= ra->start) { ra->pattern = RA_PATTERN_BACKWARDS; ra->size = get_next_ra_size(ra, max); if (ra->size > ra->start) { /* * ra->start may be concurrently set to some huge * value, the min() at least avoids submitting huge IO * in this race condition */ ra->size = min(ra->start, max); ra->start = 0; } else ra->start -= ra->size; ra->async_size = 0; goto readit; } Thanks, Fengguang -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: email@kvack.org