From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] writeback: permit through good bdi even when global dirty exceeded
Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2011 23:03:59 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111201230359.306c4c17.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111202063603.GA10095@localhost>
On Fri, 2 Dec 2011 14:36:03 +0800 Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com> wrote:
> --- linux-next.orig/mm/page-writeback.c 2011-12-02 10:16:21.000000000 +0800
> +++ linux-next/mm/page-writeback.c 2011-12-02 14:28:44.000000000 +0800
> @@ -1182,6 +1182,14 @@ pause:
> if (task_ratelimit)
> break;
>
> + /*
> + * In the case of an unresponding NFS server and the NFS dirty
> + * pages exceeds dirty_thresh, give the other good bdi's a pipe
> + * to go through, so that tasks on them still remain responsive.
> + */
> + if (bdi_dirty < 8)
> + break;
What happens if the local disk has nine dirty pages?
Also: please, no more magic numbers. We have too many in there already.
What to do instead? Perhaps arrange for devices which can block in
this fashion to be identified as such in their backing_device and then
prevent the kernel from ever permitting such devices to fully consume
the dirty-page pool.
If someone later comes along and decreases the dirty limits mid-flight,
I guess the same problem occurs. This can perhaps be handled by not
permitting to limit to be set that low at that time.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-12-02 7:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-12-01 10:27 [PATCH] fs: Make write(2) interruptible by a fatal signal Jan Kara
2011-12-01 12:24 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-12-01 14:27 ` Matthew Wilcox
2011-12-01 16:10 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-12-02 11:58 ` Janne Blomqvist
2011-12-02 2:05 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-12-02 6:36 ` [PATCH] writeback: permit through good bdi even when global dirty exceeded Wu Fengguang
2011-12-02 7:03 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2011-12-02 8:29 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-12-02 10:16 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-12-02 10:28 ` Wu Fengguang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20111201230359.306c4c17.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matthew@wil.cx \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).