linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/7] writeback: fix dirtied pages accounting on sub-page writes
Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2011 11:53:40 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111207105340.GF4622@quack.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111128140513.275099009@intel.com>

On Mon 28-11-11 21:53:41, Wu Fengguang wrote:
> When dd in 512bytes, generic_perform_write() calls
> balance_dirty_pages_ratelimited() 8 times for the same page, but
> obviously the page is only dirtied once.
  Actually, for ppc where pages can be 64 KB the problem is even worse.

> Fix it by accounting tsk->nr_dirtied and bdp_ratelimits at page dirty time.
  I was wondering about one more thing - couldn't we rather check in
generic_perform_write() whether the page was dirty before calling
->write_end and call balance_dirty_pages_ratelimited() only if it wasn't?

  For generic_perform_write() it doesn't really matter that much since we
do things page-by-page anyway but other callers could be more efficient...

								Honza

> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
> Signed-off-by: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
> ---
>  mm/page-writeback.c |   13 +++++--------
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> --- linux-next.orig/mm/page-writeback.c	2011-11-28 21:23:20.000000000 +0800
> +++ linux-next/mm/page-writeback.c	2011-11-28 21:23:23.000000000 +0800
> @@ -1239,8 +1239,6 @@ void balance_dirty_pages_ratelimited_nr(
>  	if (bdi->dirty_exceeded)
>  		ratelimit = min(ratelimit, 32 >> (PAGE_SHIFT - 10));
>  
> -	current->nr_dirtied += nr_pages_dirtied;
> -
>  	preempt_disable();
>  	/*
>  	 * This prevents one CPU to accumulate too many dirtied pages without
> @@ -1251,12 +1249,9 @@ void balance_dirty_pages_ratelimited_nr(
>  	p =  &__get_cpu_var(bdp_ratelimits);
>  	if (unlikely(current->nr_dirtied >= ratelimit))
>  		*p = 0;
> -	else {
> -		*p += nr_pages_dirtied;
> -		if (unlikely(*p >= ratelimit_pages)) {
> -			*p = 0;
> -			ratelimit = 0;
> -		}
> +	else if (unlikely(*p >= ratelimit_pages)) {
> +		*p = 0;
> +		ratelimit = 0;
>  	}
>  	/*
>  	 * Pick up the dirtied pages by the exited tasks. This avoids lots of
> @@ -1749,6 +1744,8 @@ void account_page_dirtied(struct page *p
>  		__inc_bdi_stat(mapping->backing_dev_info, BDI_RECLAIMABLE);
>  		__inc_bdi_stat(mapping->backing_dev_info, BDI_DIRTIED);
>  		task_io_account_write(PAGE_CACHE_SIZE);
> +		current->nr_dirtied++;
> +		this_cpu_inc(bdp_ratelimits);
>  	}
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(account_page_dirtied);
> 
> 
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
SUSE Labs, CR

  reply	other threads:[~2011-12-07 10:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-11-28 13:53 [PATCH 0/7] dirty throttling bits for 3.3 (v2) Wu Fengguang
2011-11-28 13:53 ` [PATCH 1/7] writeback: balanced_rate cannot exceed write bandwidth Wu Fengguang
2011-12-07 10:21   ` Jan Kara
2011-11-28 13:53 ` [PATCH 2/7] writeback: charge leaked page dirties to active tasks Wu Fengguang
2011-12-07 10:23   ` Jan Kara
2011-11-28 13:53 ` [PATCH 3/7] writeback: fix dirtied pages accounting on sub-page writes Wu Fengguang
2011-12-07 10:53   ` Jan Kara [this message]
2011-12-07 12:08     ` Wu Fengguang
2011-12-07 16:07       ` Jan Kara
2011-12-08  2:44         ` Wu Fengguang
2011-11-28 13:53 ` [PATCH 4/7] writeback: fix dirtied pages accounting on redirty Wu Fengguang
2011-12-07 16:09   ` Jan Kara
2011-11-28 13:53 ` [PATCH 5/7] btrfs: fix dirtied pages accounting on sub-page writes Wu Fengguang
2011-11-28 14:16   ` Wu Fengguang
2011-11-28 13:53 ` [PATCH 6/7] writeback: dirty ratelimit - think time compensation Wu Fengguang
2011-12-07 16:14   ` Jan Kara
2011-11-28 13:53 ` [PATCH 7/7] writeback: comment on the bdi dirty threshold Wu Fengguang
2011-12-07 10:57   ` Jan Kara

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20111207105340.GF4622@quack.suse.cz \
    --to=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).