linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
To: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: mc@linux.vnet.ibm.com, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	Nick Piggin <npiggin@kernel.dk>,
	david@fromorbit.com,
	"akpm@linux-foundation.org" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Maciej Rutecki <maciej.rutecki@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] VFS: br_write_lock locks on possible CPUs other than online CPUs
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2011 19:58:06 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111220195806.GF23916@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4EF0DE04.6030604@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 12:42:04AM +0530, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:
> register_hotcpu_notifier(...);
> grab spinlock
> for_each_online_cpu(N)
>   add N to bitmap
> release spinlock
> 
> because the latter code is not fully race-free (because we don't handle
> CPU_DOWN_PREPARE event in the callback and hence cpu_online_mask can get
> updated in-between). But it would still work since cpus going down don't
> really pose problems for us.

Um?  Sure, that loop can end up adding CPUs on their way down into the set.
And as soon as they get their CPU_DEAD, notifier will prune them out...  Or
is there something I'm missing here?  Anyway, the variant I have here
(untested) follows:

diff --git a/include/linux/lglock.h b/include/linux/lglock.h
index f549056..1951f67 100644
--- a/include/linux/lglock.h
+++ b/include/linux/lglock.h
@@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
 #include <linux/spinlock.h>
 #include <linux/lockdep.h>
 #include <linux/percpu.h>
+#include <linux/cpu.h>
 
 /* can make br locks by using local lock for read side, global lock for write */
 #define br_lock_init(name)	name##_lock_init()
@@ -72,9 +73,31 @@
 
 #define DEFINE_LGLOCK(name)						\
 									\
+ DEFINE_SPINLOCK(name##_cpu_lock);					\
+ cpumask_t name##_cpus __read_mostly;					\
  DEFINE_PER_CPU(arch_spinlock_t, name##_lock);				\
  DEFINE_LGLOCK_LOCKDEP(name);						\
 									\
+ static int								\
+ name##_lg_cpu_callback(struct notifier_block *nb,			\
+				unsigned long action, void *hcpu)	\
+ {									\
+	switch (action & ~CPU_TASKS_FROZEN) {				\
+	case CPU_UP_PREPARE:						\
+		spin_lock(&name##_cpu_lock);				\
+		cpu_set((unsigned long)hcpu, name##_cpus);		\
+		spin_unlock(&name##_cpu_lock);				\
+		break;							\
+	case CPU_UP_CANCELED: case CPU_DEAD:				\
+		spin_lock(&name##_cpu_lock);				\
+		cpu_clear((unsigned long)hcpu, name##_cpus);		\
+		spin_unlock(&name##_cpu_lock);				\
+	}								\
+	return NOTIFY_OK;						\
+ }									\
+ static struct notifier_block name##_lg_cpu_notifier = {		\
+	.notifier_call = name##_lg_cpu_callback,			\
+ };									\
  void name##_lock_init(void) {						\
 	int i;								\
 	LOCKDEP_INIT_MAP(&name##_lock_dep_map, #name, &name##_lock_key, 0); \
@@ -83,6 +106,11 @@
 		lock = &per_cpu(name##_lock, i);			\
 		*lock = (arch_spinlock_t)__ARCH_SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED;	\
 	}								\
+	register_hotcpu_notifier(&name##_lg_cpu_notifier);		\
+	spin_lock(&name##_cpu_lock);					\
+	for_each_online_cpu(i)						\
+		cpu_set(i, name##_cpus);				\
+	spin_unlock(&name##_cpu_lock);					\
  }									\
  EXPORT_SYMBOL(name##_lock_init);					\
 									\
@@ -124,9 +152,9 @@
 									\
  void name##_global_lock_online(void) {					\
 	int i;								\
-	preempt_disable();						\
+	spin_lock(&name##_cpu_lock);					\
 	rwlock_acquire(&name##_lock_dep_map, 0, 0, _RET_IP_);		\
-	for_each_online_cpu(i) {					\
+	for_each_cpu(i, &name##_cpus) {					\
 		arch_spinlock_t *lock;					\
 		lock = &per_cpu(name##_lock, i);			\
 		arch_spin_lock(lock);					\
@@ -137,12 +165,12 @@
  void name##_global_unlock_online(void) {				\
 	int i;								\
 	rwlock_release(&name##_lock_dep_map, 1, _RET_IP_);		\
-	for_each_online_cpu(i) {					\
+	for_each_cpu(i, &name##_cpus) {					\
 		arch_spinlock_t *lock;					\
 		lock = &per_cpu(name##_lock, i);			\
 		arch_spin_unlock(lock);					\
 	}								\
-	preempt_enable();						\
+	spin_unlock(&name##_cpu_lock);					\
  }									\
  EXPORT_SYMBOL(name##_global_unlock_online);				\
 									\

  reply	other threads:[~2011-12-20 19:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-12-19  3:36 [PATCH] VFS: br_write_lock locks on possible CPUs other than online CPUs mengcong
2011-12-19  4:11 ` Al Viro
2011-12-19  5:00   ` Dave Chinner
2011-12-19  6:07     ` mengcong
2011-12-19  7:31 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2011-12-19  9:12   ` Stephen Boyd
2011-12-19 11:03     ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2011-12-19 12:11       ` Al Viro
2011-12-19 20:23         ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2011-12-19 20:52           ` Al Viro
2011-12-20  4:56             ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2011-12-20  6:27               ` Al Viro
2011-12-20  7:28                 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2011-12-20  9:37                   ` mengcong
2011-12-20 10:36                     ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2011-12-20 11:08                       ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2011-12-20 12:50                         ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2011-12-20 14:06                           ` Al Viro
2011-12-20 14:35                             ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2011-12-20 17:59                               ` Al Viro
2011-12-20 19:12                                 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2011-12-20 19:58                                   ` Al Viro [this message]
2011-12-20 22:27                                     ` Dave Chinner
2011-12-20 23:31                                       ` Al Viro
2011-12-21 21:15                                     ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2011-12-21 22:02                                       ` Al Viro
2011-12-21 22:12                                       ` Andrew Morton
2011-12-22  7:02                                         ` Al Viro
2011-12-22  7:20                                           ` Andrew Morton
2011-12-22  8:08                                             ` Al Viro
2011-12-22  8:17                                               ` Andi Kleen
2011-12-22  8:39                                                 ` Al Viro
2011-12-22  8:22                                             ` Andi Kleen
2011-12-20  7:30                 ` mengcong
2011-12-20  7:37                   ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2011-12-19 23:56         ` Dave Chinner
2011-12-20  4:05           ` Al Viro

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20111220195806.GF23916@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
    --to=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maciej.rutecki@gmail.com \
    --cc=mc@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=npiggin@kernel.dk \
    --cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).