From: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@canonical.com>
To: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>,
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, Josh Boyer <jwboyer@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][BUGFIX][RESEND] vfs: Correctly set the dir i_mutex lockdep class
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2012 12:39:55 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120120183954.GA9156@boyd> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1323705750-28536-1-git-send-email-tyhicks@canonical.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2888 bytes --]
On 2011-12-12 10:02:30, Tyler Hicks wrote:
> 9a7aa12f3911853a introduced additional logic around setting the i_mutex
> lockdep class for directory inodes. The idea was that some filesystems
> may want their own special lockdep class for different directory
> inodes and calling unlock_new_inode() should not clobber one of
> those special classes.
>
> I believe that the added conditional, around the *negated* return value
> of lockdep_match_class(), caused directory inodes to be placed in the
> wrong lockdep class.
>
> inode_init_always() sets the i_mutex lockdep class with i_mutex_key for
> all inodes. If the filesystem did not change the class during inode
> initialization, then the conditional mentioned above was false and the
> directory inode was incorrectly left in the non-directory lockdep class.
> If the filesystem did set a special lockdep class, then the conditional
> mentioned above was true and that class was clobbered with
> i_mutex_dir_key.
>
> This patch removes the negation from the conditional so that the i_mutex
> lockdep class is properly set for directory inodes. Special classes are
> preserved and directory inodes with unmodified classes are set with
> i_mutex_dir_key.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@canonical.com>
> Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
> ---
>
> Hi Al - I thought I'd resend this fix after seeing Mimi's RFC for more
> filesystems to use lockdep_annotate_inode_mutex_key(). Currently, that function
> doesn't do what it is supposed to do.
Hi Al - Just following up again to see if I can get any comments on this
bug fix in hopes of getting it picked up soon.
Searching back through list archives, I realize there have been debates
about the locking order of i_mutex vs mmap_sem among directory and
regular inodes, which I imagine is the reason for this bit of code. But
either way, the lock class setting of directory inodes is broken here.
Adding hch and akpm to cc for extra eyes/comments.
Tyler
>
> fs/inode.c | 3 +--
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/inode.c b/fs/inode.c
> index ee4e66b..9d01a0d 100644
> --- a/fs/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/inode.c
> @@ -855,8 +855,7 @@ void lockdep_annotate_inode_mutex_key(struct inode *inode)
> struct file_system_type *type = inode->i_sb->s_type;
>
> /* Set new key only if filesystem hasn't already changed it */
> - if (!lockdep_match_class(&inode->i_mutex,
> - &type->i_mutex_key)) {
> + if (lockdep_match_class(&inode->i_mutex, &type->i_mutex_key)) {
> /*
> * ensure nobody is actually holding i_mutex
> */
> --
> 1.7.5.4
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-01-20 18:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-11-10 6:45 [PATCH] vfs: Correctly set the dir i_mutex lockdep class Tyler Hicks
2011-11-10 14:33 ` Jan Kara
2011-11-10 15:28 ` Tyler Hicks
2011-11-17 8:35 ` Joel Becker
2011-12-12 16:02 ` [PATCH][RESEND] " Tyler Hicks
2012-01-20 18:39 ` Tyler Hicks [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120120183954.GA9156@boyd \
--to=tyhicks@canonical.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=john.johansen@canonical.com \
--cc=jwboyer@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).