From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Al Viro Subject: Re: /etc/fstab.d yes or not Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2012 18:47:17 +0000 Message-ID: <20120120184716.GB23916@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> References: <20120120140444.GC13157@x2.net.home> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Karel Zak , linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-fsdevel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, util-linux-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Denys Vlasenko Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: util-linux-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 07:20:33PM +0100, Denys Vlasenko wrote: > On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 3:04 PM, Karel Zak wrote: > > ?BTW, systemd allows to define addition mountpoints in > > ?systemd.mount(5) unit file(s), so we already have additional place > > ?for fstab stuff... > > systemd needs a large blunt object be stuck into its eye. > > systemd was supposed to be an init replacement. > Its continuing attempts to infiltrate entire system > are very worrying. I'm not saying I like /etc/foo.d/* (hell, sed in post-install is not a big deal; not for fstab, not for inetd.conf, etc.), but yes, complaints about changes that make life somewhat more difficult for systemd are rather hypocritical, what with the embrace-and-extend games they are playing. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe util-linux" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html