From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ted Ts'o Subject: Re: /etc/fstab.d yes or not Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 20:06:02 -0500 Message-ID: <20120124010602.GA27017@thunk.org> References: <20120120140444.GC13157@x2.net.home> <20120120154912.GK8797@codelibre.net> <20120120162220.GN8797@codelibre.net> <20120123220720.1b2e9663@pyramind.ukuu.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Kay Sievers , Roger Leigh , Karel Zak , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, util-linux@vger.kernel.org To: Alan Cox Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120123220720.1b2e9663@pyramind.ukuu.org.uk> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 10:07:20PM +0000, Alan Cox wrote: > > So with a good coding hat on - please don't consider fstab API, it's got > a programming interface 8). Otherwise I agree fstab.d is wrong. > It has a programming interface for reading, but other programs can do modify (and read) the file directly. If some joker decided to change the formatting of /etc/fstab from tab-delimeted to some crazy XML encoding, I am certain things would break. - Ted