linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ted Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
To: Zach Brown <zab@zabbo.net>
Cc: Dave Kleikamp <dave.kleikamp@oracle.com>, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [ATTEND] Attendance request
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2012 15:58:43 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120202205843.GD1032@thunk.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F2AF737.9020106@zabbo.net>

On Thu, Feb 02, 2012 at 03:51:03PM -0500, Zach Brown wrote:
> 
> Well, for that one blocking case in the submission path.
> 
> I certainly understand the desire to just make things less painful in
> this case, but I do wonder if the long-term win is to sink resources
> into trying to get threads executings async op so that the code paths
> don't have to be butchered into state machines around each potential
> blocking op.

I only intend to do this for reads and non-allocating writes; in those
cases, it's actually pretty easy.  And if everything is already in
cache, it's a lot easier to make things fast and not require diving
into workqueue or some other kernel thread.

My concern with just stuffing every single io_submit into a kernel
thread is the overhead involved, especially if there is a high rate of
AIO submission (think high-speed PCIe-attached flash).  Either you
will end up blocking waiting for a kernel thread to be available, or
you will burn a huge amount of kernel memory for the thread stacks if
nothing else.

						- Ted

  reply	other threads:[~2012-02-02 20:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-02-02 16:51 [ATTEND] Attendance request Dave Kleikamp
2012-02-02 19:00 ` Zach Brown
2012-02-02 19:07   ` Dave Kleikamp
2012-02-02 20:29 ` Ted Ts'o
2012-02-02 20:51   ` Zach Brown
2012-02-02 20:58     ` Ted Ts'o [this message]
2012-02-02 21:03       ` Zach Brown
2012-02-03  2:20   ` Zheng Liu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120202205843.GD1032@thunk.org \
    --to=tytso@mit.edu \
    --cc=dave.kleikamp@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=zab@zabbo.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).