From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Gilad Ben-Yossef <gilad@benyossef.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>,
Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>,
Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@gmail.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>, Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>,
Kosaki Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@gmail.com>,
Milton Miller <miltonm@bga.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 4/8] smp: add func to IPI cpus based on parameter func
Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2012 14:26:25 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120209142625.0664e055.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1328776585-22518-5-git-send-email-gilad@benyossef.com>
On Thu, 9 Feb 2012 10:36:21 +0200
Gilad Ben-Yossef <gilad@benyossef.com> wrote:
> @@ -153,6 +162,22 @@ static inline int up_smp_call_function(smp_call_func_t func, void *info)
> local_irq_enable(); \
> } \
> } while (0)
> +/*
> + * Preemption is disabled here to make sure the
> + * cond_func is called under the same condtions in UP
> + * and SMP.
> + */
> +#define on_each_cpu_cond(cond_func, func, info, wait, gfp_flags) \
> + do {
> + void *__info = (info); \
> + preempt_disable(); \
> + if ((cond_func)(0, __info)) { \
> + local_irq_disable(); \
> + (func)(__info); \
> + local_irq_enable(); \
> + } \
> + preempt_enable(); \
> + } while (0)
That wasn't compile-tested!
This is one of the many reasons why I convert replacement patches into
incremental patches - so I can see what was done.
Here's what I queued after converting this patch into a delta:
--- a/kernel/smp.c~smp-add-func-to-ipi-cpus-based-on-parameter-func-v9
+++ a/kernel/smp.c
@@ -771,7 +771,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(on_each_cpu_mask);
* The function might sleep if the GFP flags indicates a non
* atomic allocation is allowed.
*
- * Preemption is disabled to protect against a hotplug event.
+ * Preemption is disabled to protect against CPU going offline but not
+ * online. CPUs going online during the call will not be seen or sent
+ * an IPI.
*
* You must not call this function with disabled interrupts or
* from a hardware interrupt handler or from a bottom half handler.
_
And I queued a small fix to that:
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: smp-add-func-to-ipi-cpus-based-on-parameter-func-v9-fix
s/CPU/CPUs, use all 80 cols in comment
Cc: Gilad Ben-Yossef <gilad@benyossef.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---
kernel/smp.c | 5 ++---
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
--- a/kernel/smp.c~smp-add-func-to-ipi-cpus-based-on-parameter-func-v9-fix
+++ a/kernel/smp.c
@@ -771,9 +771,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(on_each_cpu_mask);
* The function might sleep if the GFP flags indicates a non
* atomic allocation is allowed.
*
- * Preemption is disabled to protect against CPU going offline but not
- * online. CPUs going online during the call will not be seen or sent
- * an IPI.
+ * Preemption is disabled to protect against CPUs going offline but not online.
+ * CPUs going online during the call will not be seen or sent an IPI.
*
* You must not call this function with disabled interrupts or
* from a hardware interrupt handler or from a bottom half handler.
_
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-02-09 22:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1328776585-22518-1-git-send-email-gilad@benyossef.com>
2012-02-09 8:36 ` [PATCH v9 1/8] smp: introduce a generic on_each_cpu_mask function Gilad Ben-Yossef
2012-02-09 8:36 ` [PATCH v9 2/8] arm: move arm over to generic on_each_cpu_mask Gilad Ben-Yossef
2012-02-09 8:36 ` [PATCH v9 3/8] tile: move tile to use " Gilad Ben-Yossef
2012-02-09 8:36 ` [PATCH v9 4/8] smp: add func to IPI cpus based on parameter func Gilad Ben-Yossef
2012-02-09 22:26 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2012-02-09 8:36 ` [PATCH v9 5/8] slub: only IPI CPUs that have per cpu obj to flush Gilad Ben-Yossef
2012-02-09 8:36 ` [PATCH v9 6/8] fs: only send IPI to invalidate LRU BH when needed Gilad Ben-Yossef
2012-02-09 8:36 ` [PATCH v9 7/8] mm: only IPI CPUs to drain local pages if they exist Gilad Ben-Yossef
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120209142625.0664e055.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cmetcalf@tilera.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=gilad@benyossef.com \
--cc=kosaki.motohiro@gmail.com \
--cc=levinsasha928@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=miltonm@bga.com \
--cc=mpm@selenic.com \
--cc=penberg@kernel.org \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).