From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jan Kara Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] vfs: Provide function to get superblock and wait for it to thaw Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 15:24:18 +0100 Message-ID: <20120213142418.GA6478@quack.suse.cz> References: <1328868181-16979-1-git-send-email-jack@suse.cz> <1328868181-16979-2-git-send-email-jack@suse.cz> <20120212211325.GT23916@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Jan Kara , LKML , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Dave Chinner , mpatocka@redhat.com, Eric Sandeen To: Al Viro Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120212211325.GT23916@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org On Sun 12-02-12 21:13:25, Al Viro wrote: > On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 11:03:00AM +0100, Jan Kara wrote: > > In quota code we need to find a superblock corresponding to a device and wait > > for superblock to be unfrozen. However this waiting has to happen without > > s_umount semaphore because that is required for superblock to thaw. So provide > > a function in VFS for this to keep dances with s_umount where they belong. > > Eww... All it takes is > struct super_block *get_super_thawed(struct block_device *bdev) > { > while (1) { > struct super_block *s = get_super(bdev); > if (!s || s->s_frozen == SB_UNFROZEN) > return s; > up_read(&s->s_umount); > vfs_check_frozen(s, SB_FREEZE_WRITE); > put_super(s); > } > } > and there's no need of extra arguments, etc. whatsoever. Both patches > applied, with implementation of get_super_thawed() done as above. Yeah, this looks better. Thanks! Honza -- Jan Kara SUSE Labs, CR