From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jason Baron Subject: Re: [patch] epoll: remove unneeded variable in reverse_path_check() Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2012 09:53:24 -0500 Message-ID: <20120224145323.GA2395@redhat.com> References: <20120224113158.GA17641@elgon.mountain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Alexander Viro , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org To: Dan Carpenter Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120224113158.GA17641@elgon.mountain> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 02:31:58PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > We never use the length variable. > > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter > > diff --git a/fs/eventpoll.c b/fs/eventpoll.c > index c636fc8..997a6d2 100644 > --- a/fs/eventpoll.c > +++ b/fs/eventpoll.c > @@ -1042,13 +1042,11 @@ static int reverse_path_check_proc(void *priv, void *cookie, int call_nests) > */ > static int reverse_path_check(void) > { > - int length = 0; > int error = 0; > struct file *current_file; > > /* let's call this for all tfiles */ > list_for_each_entry(current_file, &tfile_check_list, f_tfile_llink) { > - length++; > path_count_init(); > error = ep_call_nested(&poll_loop_ncalls, EP_MAX_NESTS, > reverse_path_check_proc, current_file, Yes, I had that in there while testing, and should have removed it. Acked-by: Jason Baron Thanks, -Jason