From: Djalal Harouni <tixxdz@opendz.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
Vasiliy Kulikov <segoon@openwall.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
Solar Designer <solar@openwall.com>,
WANG Cong <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>,
James Morris <james.l.morris@oracle.com>,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Stephen Wilson <wilsons@start.ca>,
"Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/9] exec: add a global execve counter
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 00:32:33 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120311233233.GC10787@dztty> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+55aFweRPaxMk1Y8vQg+yzwRA94GYngtZLrB0AkHo5-egfQBg@mail.gmail.com>
On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 03:48:02PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 10:25 AM, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > It should be per-process, signal_struct makes more sense. Or may be
> > mm_struct.
>
> I do wonder if we shouldn't just consider the "struct mm_struct"
> pointer to *be* the unique exec ID. It's what /proc/pid/mem does, and
> it works fine, and allows us to just use a normal pointer as the
> unique ID.
>
> Just increment the mm_count for the thing, and hold a reference to it,
> and now you're all done.
Please Linus have you checked the:
[PATCH 9/9] proc: improve and clean up /proc/<pid>/mem protection
That keeping the mm struct wont work, since it will eat memory and the
OOM-killer will kill some innocent processes, and the abuse can only be
catched by the VFS.
What's your opinion on it ?
And if we do the same for all the /proc/<pid>/* files and even if you
clear the VM of the old process, some other information will still be
available, even if it is not useful, this is not consistent.
Is it ok if the code keeps different objects related to dead processes
alive ?
--
tixxdz
http://opendz.org
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-03-11 23:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-03-10 23:25 [PATCH 0/9] proc: protect /proc/<pid>/* files across execve Djalal Harouni
2012-03-10 23:25 ` [PATCH 1/9] exec: add a global execve counter Djalal Harouni
2012-03-11 0:12 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-03-11 0:36 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-03-11 0:58 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-03-11 8:24 ` Solar Designer
2012-03-11 9:56 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-03-11 14:03 ` Alan Cox
2012-03-11 17:15 ` Djalal Harouni
2012-03-11 8:39 ` Djalal Harouni
2012-03-11 9:40 ` Solar Designer
2012-03-11 17:25 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-03-11 17:49 ` self_exec_id/parent_exec_id && CLONE_PARENT Oleg Nesterov
2012-03-11 18:02 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-03-11 18:37 ` richard -rw- weinberger
2012-03-11 18:39 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-03-14 18:55 ` [PATCH 0/1] (Was: self_exec_id/parent_exec_id && CLONE_PARENT) Oleg Nesterov
2012-03-14 18:55 ` [PATCH 1/1] CLONE_PARENT shouldn't allow to set ->exit_signal Oleg Nesterov
2012-03-18 18:25 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-03-18 20:53 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-03-11 22:48 ` [PATCH 1/9] exec: add a global execve counter Linus Torvalds
2012-03-11 23:32 ` Djalal Harouni [this message]
2012-03-11 23:42 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-03-12 0:25 ` Djalal Harouni
2012-03-12 10:11 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-03-12 14:01 ` Djalal Harouni
2012-03-11 23:36 ` Djalal Harouni
2012-03-12 14:34 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-03-10 23:25 ` [PATCH 2/9] proc: add proc_file_private struct to store private information Djalal Harouni
2012-03-10 23:25 ` [PATCH 3/9] proc: new proc_exec_id_ok() helper function Djalal Harouni
2012-03-10 23:25 ` [PATCH 4/9] proc: protect /proc/<pid>/* INF files from reader across execve Djalal Harouni
2012-03-10 23:25 ` [PATCH 5/9] proc: add protection support for /proc/<pid>/* ONE files Djalal Harouni
2012-03-10 23:25 ` [PATCH 6/9] proc: protect /proc/<pid>/* ONE files from reader across execve Djalal Harouni
2012-03-10 23:25 ` [PATCH 7/9] proc: protect /proc/<pid>/{maps,smaps,numa_maps} Djalal Harouni
2012-03-10 23:25 ` [PATCH 8/9] proc: protect /proc/<pid>/{environ,pagemap} across execve Djalal Harouni
2012-03-11 8:05 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2012-03-11 17:01 ` Djalal Harouni
2012-03-10 23:25 ` [PATCH 9/9] proc: improve and clean up /proc/<pid>/mem protection Djalal Harouni
2012-03-11 0:01 ` [PATCH 0/9] proc: protect /proc/<pid>/* files across execve Linus Torvalds
2012-03-11 0:27 ` Djalal Harouni
2012-03-11 8:46 ` Djalal Harouni
2012-03-11 10:35 ` exec_id protection from bad child exit signals (was: Re: [PATCH 0/9] proc: protect /proc/<pid>/* files across execve) Solar Designer
2012-03-11 18:20 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-03-12 19:13 ` [PATCH 0/9] proc: protect /proc/<pid>/* files across execve Eric W. Biederman
2012-03-12 20:44 ` Djalal Harouni
2012-03-12 21:47 ` Eric W. Biederman
2012-03-12 22:41 ` Djalal Harouni
2012-03-12 23:10 ` Eric W. Biederman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120311233233.GC10787@dztty \
--to=tixxdz@opendz.org \
--cc=Jason@zx2c4.com \
--cc=adobriyan@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=james.l.morris@oracle.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=segoon@openwall.com \
--cc=solar@openwall.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=wilsons@start.ca \
--cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).