From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/25] vfs: add i_op->atomic_create()
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 07:55:52 -0400
Message-ID: <20120313115552.GA21043@infradead.org>
References: <1331155362-11132-1-git-send-email-miklos@szeredi.hu>
 <1331155362-11132-7-git-send-email-miklos@szeredi.hu>
 <20120313093720.GC11797@infradead.org>
 <87lin49259.fsf@tucsk.pomaz.szeredi.hu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>, viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com, sfrench@samba.org, sage@newdream.net,
	ericvh@gmail.com
To: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <87lin49259.fsf@tucsk.pomaz.szeredi.hu>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org

On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 12:22:10PM +0100, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> Good point.  Yes, ->create is probably worth getting rid of.  Mkdir, I'm
> not so sure, but I'll look at what filesystems are doing.

Btw, is there any good reason to keep ->atomic_open and ->atomic_create
separate?  It seems like the instances in general share code anyway.