From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andi Kleen Subject: Re: [PATCH] vfs namespace: Don't assume mount namespace has valid root Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 18:05:36 -0700 Message-ID: <20120315010536.GC8817@tassilo.jf.intel.com> References: <1331758710-16400-1-git-send-email-levinsasha928@gmail.com> <20120314201048.GI23916@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <20120314205809.GJ23916@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <20120314213746.GK23916@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <20120314221908.GM23916@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Sasha Levin , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, davej@redhat.com To: Al Viro Return-path: Received: from mga09.intel.com ([134.134.136.24]:12260 "EHLO mga09.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965341Ab2COBFf (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Mar 2012 21:05:35 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120314221908.GM23916@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: > * Second pass: switch the tsk->fs->* elements and mark new vfsmounts > @@ -2416,9 +2416,9 @@ bool is_path_reachable(struct mount *mnt, struct dentry *dentry, > > IOW, Andi has hit delete one too many times... Oops. Sorry about that. Thanks for catching it. The obvious patch looks good to me of course. -Andi -- ak@linux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only