From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>,
viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Linux Btrfs <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] Btrfs: fix deadlock on umount by umount_prepare interface
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2012 17:29:02 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120322062902.GF3592@dastard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F6AB7C6.4020300@cn.fujitsu.com>
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 01:25:26PM +0800, Miao Xie wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Mar 2012 15:39:36 +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 11:13:17AM +0800, Miao Xie wrote:
> >> The reason the deadlock is that:
> >> Task Btrfs-cleaner
> >> umount()
> >> down_write(&s->s_umount)
> >> close_ctree()
> >> wait for the end of
> >> btrfs-cleaner
> >> start_transaction
> >> reserve space
> >> shrink_delalloc()
> >> writeback_inodes_sb_nr_if_idle()
> >> down_read(&sb->s_umount)
> >> So, the deadlock has happened.
> >
> > Every time a deadlock involving writeback_inodes_sb...if_idle()
> > comes up, I give the same response. If the s_umount is write locked,
> > then the sb is not idle. IOWs, writeback_inodes_sb...if_idle()
> > should be doing down_read_trylock(), not down_read().
>
> Someone did this work several months ago, but those patches have not been
> applied until now, so...
... work to get them into the current/next release.
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-03-22 6:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-03-22 3:13 [RFC PATCH 2/2] Btrfs: fix deadlock on umount by umount_prepare interface Miao Xie
2012-03-22 4:39 ` Dave Chinner
2012-03-22 5:25 ` Miao Xie
2012-03-22 6:29 ` Dave Chinner [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120322062902.GF3592@dastard \
--to=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=chris.mason@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=miaox@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).