From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>,
Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>, Alex Elder <elder@kernel.org>,
Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@dilger.ca>,
Ben Myers <bpm@sgi.com>, Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org>, Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm for fs: add truncate_pagecache_range
Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2012 13:50:02 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120325135002.185b4caf.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LSU.2.00.1203251254570.1505@eggly.anvils>
On Sun, 25 Mar 2012 13:26:10 -0700 (PDT) Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> wrote:
> Building a test kernel quickly told me that inode->i_mapping->i_mutex
> doesn't exist, of course it's inode->i_mutex.
>
> Then running the test kernel quickly told me that neither ext4 nor xfs
> (I didn't try ocfs2) holds inode->i_mutex where holepunching calls
> truncate_inode_pages_range().
>
> Now, there might or might not be reasons why ext4 or xfs ought to hold
> i_mutex there for its own consistency, but it's beyond me to determine
> that: let's assume they're correct without evidence to the contrary.
>
> Stabilizing i_size is not a reason: holepunching does not affect i_size
> and is not affected by i_size (okay, ext4 still has the bug I reported
> a couple of months ago, whereby its holepunching stops at i_size,
> forgetting blocks fallocated beyond; but no doubt that will get fixed).
>
> And nothing that truncate_pagecache_range() does needs i_mutex:
> neither the unmap_mapping_range() nor the truncate_inode_pages_range()
> needs i_mutex. A year ago, yes, Miklos showed how unmap_mapping_range()
> was relying on mutex serialization, and added an additional mutex for
> that, which Peter was able to remove once he mutified i_mmap_lock.
>
> truncate_pagecache_range() is just a drop-in replacement for
> truncate_inode_pages_range(), and has no different locking needs.
Does anything prevent new pages from getting added to pagecache and
perhaps faulted into VMAs after or during the execution of these
functions?
Also, I wonder what prevents pages in the range from being dirtied
between ext4_ext_punch_hole()'s filemap_write_and_wait_range() and
truncate_inode_pages_range().
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-03-25 20:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-03-23 20:46 [PATCH] mm for fs: add truncate_pagecache_range Hugh Dickins
2012-03-23 21:01 ` Andrew Morton
2012-03-23 21:14 ` Hugh Dickins
2012-03-23 22:59 ` Andrew Morton
2012-03-25 20:26 ` Hugh Dickins
2012-03-25 20:50 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2012-03-25 21:55 ` Hugh Dickins
2012-04-03 5:45 ` Joel Becker
2012-05-13 21:03 ` Hugh Dickins
2012-05-17 9:25 ` Joel Becker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120325135002.185b4caf.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
--cc=bpm@sgi.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=elder@kernel.org \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=jlbec@evilplan.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mfasheh@suse.com \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).