linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
To: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Cc: Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	Suresh Jayaraman <sjayaraman@suse.com>,
	Andrea Righi <andrea@betterlinux.com>,
	Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] buffered write IO controller in balance_dirty_pages()
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 06:35:42 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120328223542.GA11065@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120328211017.GF3376@redhat.com>

Hi Vivek,

On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 05:10:18PM -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 08:13:08PM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote:
> > 
> > Here is one possible solution to "buffered write IO controller", based on Linux
> > v3.3
> > 
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/wfg/linux.git  buffered-write-io-controller
> > 
> > Features:
> > - support blkio.weight
> 
> So this does proportional write bandwidth division on bdi for buffered
> writes?

Right. That is done in patch 3, costing only 3 lines in balance_dirty_pages().

> > - support blkio.throttle.buffered_write_bps
> 
> This is absolute limit systemwide or per bdi?

It's per-blkcg absolute limit. It can be extended to per-blkcg-per-bdi
limits w/o changing the basic algorithms. We only need to change interface and
vectorize the variables:
        struct percpu_counter nr_dirtied;
        unsigned long bw_time_stamp;
        unsigned long dirtied_stamp;
        unsigned long dirty_ratelimit;
        unsigned long long buffered_write_bps;
and add a "bdi" parameter to relevant functions.

> [..]
> > The test results included in the last patch look pretty good in despite of the
> > simple implementation.
> > 
> >  [PATCH 1/6] blk-cgroup: move blk-cgroup.h in include/linux/blk-cgroup.h
> >  [PATCH 2/6] blk-cgroup: account dirtied pages
> >  [PATCH 3/6] blk-cgroup: buffered write IO controller - bandwidth weight
> >  [PATCH 4/6] blk-cgroup: buffered write IO controller - bandwidth limit
> >  [PATCH 5/6] blk-cgroup: buffered write IO controller - bandwidth limit interface
> >  [PATCH 6/6] blk-cgroup: buffered write IO controller - debug trace
> > 
> 
> Hi Fengguang,
> 
> Only patch 0 and patch 4 have shown up in my mail box. Same seems to be
> the case for lkml. I am wondering what happened to rest of the patches.

Sorry I shut down my laptop before all emails are sent out.

> Will understand the patches better once I have the full set.

OK, thanks!

Fengguang

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2012-03-28 22:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-03-28 12:13 [PATCH 0/6] buffered write IO controller in balance_dirty_pages() Fengguang Wu
2012-03-28 12:13 ` [PATCH 1/6] blk-cgroup: move blk-cgroup.h in include/linux/blk-cgroup.h Fengguang Wu
2012-03-28 12:13 ` [PATCH 2/6] blk-cgroup: account dirtied pages Fengguang Wu
2012-03-28 12:13 ` [PATCH 3/6] blk-cgroup: buffered write IO controller - bandwidth weight Fengguang Wu
2012-03-28 12:13 ` [PATCH 4/6] blk-cgroup: buffered write IO controller - bandwidth limit Fengguang Wu
2012-03-28 12:13 ` [PATCH 5/6] blk-cgroup: buffered write IO controller - bandwidth limit interface Fengguang Wu
2012-03-28 12:13 ` [PATCH 6/6] blk-cgroup: buffered write IO controller - debug trace Fengguang Wu
2012-03-28 21:10 ` [PATCH 0/6] buffered write IO controller in balance_dirty_pages() Vivek Goyal
2012-03-28 22:35   ` Fengguang Wu [this message]
2012-03-29  2:48   ` Suresh Jayaraman
2012-03-29  0:34 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-03-29  1:22   ` Fengguang Wu
2012-04-01  4:16 ` Suresh Jayaraman
2012-04-01  8:30   ` Fengguang Wu
2012-04-01 20:56 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-04-03  8:00   ` Fengguang Wu
2012-04-03 14:53     ` Vivek Goyal
2012-04-03 23:32       ` Fengguang Wu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120328223542.GA11065@localhost \
    --to=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
    --cc=andrea@betterlinux.com \
    --cc=jmoyer@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=sjayaraman@suse.com \
    --cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).