From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>, Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 2/5] mm + fs: prepare for non-page entries in page cache
Date: Tue, 1 May 2012 13:24:49 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120501132449.30485966.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120501201504.GB2112@cmpxchg.org>
On Tue, 1 May 2012 22:15:04 +0200
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> wrote:
> On Tue, May 01, 2012 at 12:02:46PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Tue, 1 May 2012 10:41:50 +0200
> > Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> wrote:
> >
> > > --- a/fs/inode.c
> > > +++ b/fs/inode.c
> > > @@ -544,8 +544,7 @@ static void evict(struct inode *inode)
> > > if (op->evict_inode) {
> > > op->evict_inode(inode);
> > > } else {
> > > - if (inode->i_data.nrpages)
> > > - truncate_inode_pages(&inode->i_data, 0);
> > > + truncate_inode_pages(&inode->i_data, 0);
> >
> > Why did we lose this optimisation?
>
> For inodes with only shadow pages remaining in the tree, because there
> is no separate counter for them. Otherwise, we'd leak the tree nodes.
>
> I had mapping->nrshadows at first to keep truncation conditional, but
> thought that using an extra word per cached inode would be worse than
> removing this optimization. There is not too much being done when the
> tree is empty.
>
> Another solution would be to include the shadows count in ->nrpages,
> but filesystems use this counter for various other purposes.
>
> Do you think it's worth reconsidering?
It doesn't sound like it's worth adding ->nrshadows for only that
reason.
That's a pretty significant alteration in the meaning of ->nrpages.
Did this not have any other effects?
What does truncate do? I assume it invalidates shadow page entries in
the radix tree? And frees the radix-tree nodes?
The patchset will make lookups slower in some (probably obscure)
circumstances, due to the additional radix-tree nodes.
I assume that if a pagecache lookup encounters a radix-tree node which
contains no real pages, the search will terminate at that point? We
don't pointlessly go all the way down to the leaf nodes?
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-01 20:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-01 8:41 [patch 0/5] refault distance-based file cache sizing Johannes Weiner
2012-05-01 8:41 ` [patch 1/5] mm: readahead: move radix tree hole searching here Johannes Weiner
2012-05-01 21:06 ` Rik van Riel
2012-05-01 8:41 ` [patch 2/5] mm + fs: prepare for non-page entries in page cache Johannes Weiner
2012-05-01 19:02 ` Andrew Morton
2012-05-01 20:15 ` Johannes Weiner
2012-05-01 20:24 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2012-05-01 21:14 ` Rik van Riel
2012-05-01 21:29 ` Johannes Weiner
2012-05-01 8:41 ` [patch 3/5] mm + fs: store shadow pages " Johannes Weiner
2012-05-01 8:41 ` [patch 4/5] mm + fs: provide refault distance to page cache instantiations Johannes Weiner
2012-05-01 9:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-05-01 9:55 ` Johannes Weiner
2012-05-01 9:58 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-05-01 8:41 ` [patch 5/5] mm: refault distance-based file cache sizing Johannes Weiner
2012-05-01 14:13 ` Minchan Kim
2012-05-01 15:38 ` Johannes Weiner
2012-05-02 5:21 ` Minchan Kim
2012-05-02 1:57 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2012-05-02 6:23 ` Johannes Weiner
2012-05-02 15:11 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2012-05-01 19:08 ` [patch 0/5] " Andrew Morton
2012-05-01 21:19 ` Rik van Riel
2012-05-01 21:26 ` Andrew Morton
2012-05-02 1:10 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2012-05-03 13:15 ` Johannes Weiner
2012-05-16 5:25 ` nai.xia
2012-05-16 6:51 ` Johannes Weiner
2012-05-16 12:56 ` nai.xia
2012-05-17 21:08 ` Johannes Weiner
2012-05-18 3:44 ` Nai Xia
2012-05-18 15:07 ` Rik van Riel
2012-05-18 15:30 ` Nai Xia
2012-05-17 13:11 ` Rik van Riel
2012-05-18 5:03 ` Nai Xia
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120501132449.30485966.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=minchan.kim@gmail.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).