From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com>
To: Vyacheslav Dubeyko <slava@dubeyko.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: NVM Mapping API
Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 12:10:20 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120516161020.GJ22985@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1337149453.1961.24.camel@slavad-ubuntu-11>
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 10:24:13AM +0400, Vyacheslav Dubeyko wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-05-15 at 09:34 -0400, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > There are a number of interesting non-volatile memory (NVM) technologies
> > being developed. Some of them promise DRAM-comparable latencies and
> > bandwidths. At Intel, we've been thinking about various ways to present
> > those to software.
>
> Could you please share vision of these NVM technologies in more details?
> What capacity in bytes of of one NVM unit do we can expect? What about
> bad blocks and any other reliability issues of such NVM technologies?
No, I can't comment on any of that. This isn't about any particular piece
of technology; it's an observation that there are a lot of technologies
that seem to fit in this niche; some of them are even available to
buy today.
No statement of mine should be taken as an indication of any future
Intel product plans :-)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-16 16:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-15 13:34 NVM Mapping API Matthew Wilcox
2012-05-15 17:46 ` Greg KH
2012-05-16 15:57 ` Matthew Wilcox
2012-05-18 12:07 ` Marco Stornelli
2012-05-15 23:02 ` Andy Lutomirski
2012-05-16 16:02 ` Matthew Wilcox
2012-05-31 17:53 ` Andy Lutomirski
2012-05-16 6:24 ` Vyacheslav Dubeyko
2012-05-16 16:10 ` Matthew Wilcox [this message]
2012-05-17 9:06 ` Vyacheslav Dubeyko
2012-05-16 21:58 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2012-05-17 19:06 ` Matthew Wilcox
2012-05-16 9:52 ` James Bottomley
2012-05-16 17:35 ` Matthew Wilcox
2012-05-16 19:58 ` Christian Stroetmann
2012-05-19 22:19 ` Christian Stroetmann
2012-05-17 9:54 ` James Bottomley
2012-05-17 18:59 ` Matthew Wilcox
2012-05-18 9:03 ` James Bottomley
2012-05-18 10:13 ` Boaz Harrosh
2012-05-18 14:49 ` Matthew Wilcox
2012-05-18 15:08 ` Alan Cox
2012-05-18 15:31 ` James Bottomley
2012-05-18 17:19 ` Matthew Wilcox
2012-05-16 13:04 ` Boaz Harrosh
2012-05-16 18:33 ` Matthew Wilcox
2012-05-18 9:33 ` Arnd Bergmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120516161020.GJ22985@linux.intel.com \
--to=willy@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=slava@dubeyko.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).