From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, Ted Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>,
Andreas Dilger <adilger@dilger.ca>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
Ext4 Developers List <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>,
viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk, sami.liedes@iki.fi
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vfs: avoid hang caused by attempting to rmdir an invalid file system
Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 22:12:57 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120530201256.GA32477@quack.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120530173709.GB16317@fieldses.org>
On Wed 30-05-12 13:37:09, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 10:08:56PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> > On Tue 29-05-12 21:50:19, Jan Kara wrote:
> > > On Mon 28-05-12 17:05:11, Ted Tso wrote:
> > > > On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 02:29:05PM -0600, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> > > > > This patch is good from the POV of covering all filesystems, and
> > > > > avoiding the deadlock at the dcache level. It would be possible to
> > > > > detect this problem in the filesystem itself during lookup, before
> > > > > the bad link got into the dcache itself. Something like:
> > > >
> > > > I like that as a solution for detecting the problem in ext4. As you
> > > > say, it's still an issue for other file systems, and so the patch I
> > > > proposed is still probably a good idea for the VFS. But this way ext4
> > > > (and ext3 when Jan backports it) will be able to detect the problem
> > > > and mark the file system as being corrupted.
> > > Actually, I think there's even better way. d_splice_alias() can rather
> > > easily detect the problem and report it to filesystem. The advantage is
> > > that the check in d_splice_alias() can catch any "hardlinks" to
> > > directories, not just self loops. The patch is attached, I also have
> > > corresponding handling written for ext? filesystems but that's trivial.
> > > I'll post the whole series to Al to have a look.
> > And now with the attachment. Sorry.
>
> Well, my understanding of d_splice_alias is that it should just return
> the existing dentry instead of failing. (It does that now for
> DISCONNECTED dentries, but I don't understand why they're special.)
> So that's what:
>
> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/viro/vfs.git;a=commit;h=9d345b3217b384813680901d42eae3fb380b9f77
>
> does.
Thanks for the pointer. In the case I tried to solve, returning the
existing dentry will solve the deadlocks, just user won't be warned that
the filesystem is corrupted. Since you seem to describe a valid case where
we can spot other !DISCONNECTED dentry of a directory, I guess we have no
other choice than using your approach.
We could do some sanity checks in ->lookup method (like Andreas suggested)
but they are not that powerful as a check in d_splice_alias() can be. But
what can one do...
Honza
> > >From 0715b656ac88ce1bb62800b14d99ef2e25c26d28 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
> > Date: Tue, 29 May 2012 21:19:01 +0200
> > Subject: [PATCH 1/4] vfs: Avoid creation of directory loops for corrupted filesystems
> >
> > When a directory hierarchy is corrupted (e. g. due to a bit flip on the media),
> > it can happen that it contains loops of directories. That creates possibilities
> > for deadlock when locking directories.
> >
> > Fix the problem by checking in d_splice_alias() that when we splice a
> > directory, it does not have any other connected alias.
> >
> > Reported-by: Sami Liedes <sami.liedes@iki.fi>
> > Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
> > ---
> > fs/dcache.c | 4 ++++
> > 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/dcache.c b/fs/dcache.c
> > index 4435d8b..ca31a1e 100644
> > --- a/fs/dcache.c
> > +++ b/fs/dcache.c
> > @@ -1658,6 +1658,10 @@ struct dentry *d_splice_alias(struct inode *inode, struct dentry *dentry)
> > d_move(new, dentry);
> > iput(inode);
> > } else {
> > + if (unlikely(!list_empty(&inode->i_dentry))) {
> > + spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
> > + return ERR_PTR(-EIO);
> > + }
> > /* already taking inode->i_lock, so d_add() by hand */
> > __d_instantiate(dentry, inode);
> > spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
> > --
> > 1.7.1
> >
>
--
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
SUSE Labs, CR
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-30 20:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-28 17:33 [PATCH] vfs: avoid hang caused by attempting to rmdir an invalid file system Theodore Ts'o
2012-05-28 20:29 ` Andreas Dilger
2012-05-28 21:05 ` Ted Ts'o
2012-05-29 19:50 ` Jan Kara
2012-05-29 20:08 ` Jan Kara
2012-05-30 17:37 ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-05-30 20:12 ` Jan Kara [this message]
2012-06-18 21:19 ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-06-20 9:57 ` Jan Kara
2012-05-29 8:21 ` Greg KH
2012-05-29 12:18 ` Ted Ts'o
2012-05-29 11:25 ` Bernd Schubert
[not found] <20120528173133.GA31109@thunk.org>
2012-05-28 17:34 ` Theodore Ts'o
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120530201256.GA32477@quack.suse.cz \
--to=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=adilger@dilger.ca \
--cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sami.liedes@iki.fi \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).