From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Subject: Re: writeback: bad unlock balance detected in 3.5-rc1
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 19:21:08 +0800
Message-ID: <20120611112108.GA21554@localhost>
References: <E1Sd0IP-0005nh-AJ@tytso-glaptop.cam.corp.google.com>
 <20120608150736.GF21080@quack.suse.cz>
 <20120608154535.GA887@localhost>
 <1339413676.2401.5.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
To: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@gmail.com>
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1339413676.2401.5.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org

On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 02:21:16PM +0300, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> On Sat, 2012-06-09 at 00:45 +0900, Fengguang Wu wrote:
> > I'm yet to setup and run xfstests regularly, so as to catch such kind
> > of problems earlier in future.
> 
> You definitely need to do this before merging anything upstream. I'd
> recommend to use test at least with ext4 and xfs. Probably btrfs, but I
> never tested it with xfstests.

Sure! I'll try to test all of them.

Thanks,
Fengguang