From: Wanpeng Li <liwp.linux@gmail.com>
To: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Gavin Shan <shangw@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Wanpeng Li <liwp.linux@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] writeback: fix hung_task alarm when sync block
Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2012 18:52:42 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120614105242.GB18190@kernel> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1339562553-10035-1-git-send-email-liwp.linux@gmail.com>
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 12:42:33PM +0800, Wanpeng Li wrote:
Hi Fengguang,
This patch need improve or ..., any comments or suggetions?
Best Regards,
Wanpeng Li
>
>From: Wanpeng Li <liwp@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>
>"V1 -> V2"
>* remove redundant hangcheck variable
>
>I use several dd processes to write a slow SD card
>dd if=/dev/sda1 of=/dev/sdc4 bs=1M count=4000
>and several sync commands(maybe > 10),dmesg show this:
>
>[ 366.888741] INFO: task sync:3518 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
>[ 366.888742] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
>[ 366.888746] sync D 00000201 0 3518 3462 0x00000000
>[ 366.888752] dcde5e54 00000082 00000000 00000201 00000000 c180d220 c1933d00 c1933d00
>[ 366.888758] 614a7ae7 00000023 f6bc0d00 ebecb280 c180d220 f6bc0d6c f04acbfc 00000000
>[ 366.888786] f6bc0d6c dcde5e2c 00000023 f6bc0d44 00000000 00000000 ebd8b2b4 dcde5e6c
>[ 366.888788] Call Trace:
>[ 366.888792] [<c107a0ee>] ? enqueue_entity+0xee/0x5a0
>[ 366.888795] [<c15abc83>] schedule+0x23/0x60
>[ 366.888798] [<c15aa5ad>] schedule_timeout+0x22d/0x2a0
>[ 366.888801] [<c1071ce2>] ? check_preempt_curr+0x72/0x90
>[ 366.888804] [<c1071d28>] ? ttwu_do_wakeup+0x28/0x130
>[ 366.888807] [<c1037f28>] ? default_spin_lock_flags+0x8/0x10
>[ 366.888810] [<c15acaad>] ? _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x2d/0x40
>[ 366.888813] [<c15abb17>] wait_for_common+0xa7/0x110
>[ 366.888816] [<c1074690>] ? try_to_wake_up+0x220/0x220
>[ 366.888819] [<c15abc57>] wait_for_completion+0x17/0x20
>[ 366.888822] [<c116ad80>] writeback_inodes_sb_nr+0x70/0x90
>[ 366.888825] [<c116af75>] writeback_inodes_sb+0x25/0x30
>[ 366.888828] [<c117159f>] __sync_filesystem+0x4f/0x90
>[ 366.888831] [<c11715f7>] sync_one_sb+0x17/0x20
>[ 366.888834] [<c114c430>] iterate_supers+0xc0/0xd0
>[ 366.888837] [<c11715e0>] ? __sync_filesystem+0x90/0x90
>[ 366.888831] [<c11715f7>] sync_one_sb+0x17/0x20
>[ 366.888834] [<c114c430>] iterate_supers+0xc0/0xd0
>[ 366.888837] [<c11715e0>] ? __sync_filesystem+0x90/0x90
>[ 366.888840] [<c117167b>] sys_sync+0x2b/0x60
>[ 366.888842] [<c15b385f>] sysenter_do_call+0x12/0x28
>
>Too many similar messages flood the logs. So I use a present method to
>fix this issue.
>------------------------------------------
>Author: Mark Lord <kernel@teksavvy.com>
>Date: Fri Sep 24 09:51:13 2010 -0400
>
> block: Prevent hang_check firing during long I/O
>------------------------------------------
>
>Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li <liwp.linux@gmail.com>
>
>
>---
> fs/fs-writeback.c | 6 +++++-
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
>diff --git a/fs/fs-writeback.c b/fs/fs-writeback.c
>index f2d0109..df879ee 100644
>--- a/fs/fs-writeback.c
>+++ b/fs/fs-writeback.c
>@@ -1311,7 +1311,11 @@ void writeback_inodes_sb_nr(struct super_block *sb,
>
> WARN_ON(!rwsem_is_locked(&sb->s_umount));
> bdi_queue_work(sb->s_bdi, &work);
>- wait_for_completion(&done);
>+ if (sysctl_hung_task_timeout_secs)
>+ while (!wait_for_completion_timeout(&done, HZ/2))
>+ ;
>+ else
>+ wait_for_completion(&done);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(writeback_inodes_sb_nr);
>
>--
>1.7.9.5
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-06-14 10:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-13 4:42 [PATCH V2] writeback: fix hung_task alarm when sync block Wanpeng Li
2012-06-13 14:27 ` Jeff Moyer
2012-06-13 14:48 ` Fengguang Wu
2012-06-13 14:55 ` Fengguang Wu
2012-06-13 15:34 ` Jeff Moyer
2012-06-14 13:36 ` Fengguang Wu
2012-06-19 20:14 ` Jeff Moyer
2012-06-19 21:02 ` Dave Chinner
2012-06-19 21:09 ` Jeff Moyer
2012-06-19 21:56 ` Dave Chinner
2012-06-14 1:35 ` Wanpeng Li
2012-06-14 13:26 ` Fengguang Wu
2012-06-15 22:43 ` Dave Chinner
2012-06-14 10:52 ` Wanpeng Li [this message]
2012-06-15 22:38 ` Dave Chinner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120614105242.GB18190@kernel \
--to=liwp.linux@gmail.com \
--cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shangw@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).