linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [MMTests] IO metadata on XFS
Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2012 15:32:15 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120702143215.GS14154@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120702063226.GA32151@infradead.org>

On Mon, Jul 02, 2012 at 02:32:26AM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > It increases the CPU overhead (dirty_inode can be called up to 4
> > times per write(2) call, IIRC), so with limited numbers of
> > threads/limited CPU power it will result in lower performance. Where
> > you have lots of CPU power, there will be little difference in
> > performance...
> 
> When I checked it it could only be called twice, and we'd already
> optimize away the second call.  I'd defintively like to track down where
> the performance changes happend, at least to a major version but even
> better to a -rc or git commit.
> 

By all means feel free to run the test yourself and run the bisection :)

It's rare but on this occasion the test machine is idle so I started an
automated git bisection. As you know the milage with an automated bisect
varies so it may or may not find the right commit. Test machine is sandy so
http://www.csn.ul.ie/~mel/postings/mmtests-20120424/global-dhp__io-metadata-xfs/sandy/comparison.html
is the report of interest. The script is doing a full search between v3.3 and
v3.4 for a point where average files/sec for fsmark-single drops below 25000.
I did not limit the search to fs/xfs on the off-chance that it is an
apparently unrelated patch that caused the problem.

-- 
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2012-07-02 14:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20120620113252.GE4011@suse.de>
     [not found] ` <20120629111932.GA14154@suse.de>
2012-06-29 11:23   ` [MMTests] IO metadata on ext3 Mel Gorman
2012-06-29 11:24   ` [MMTests] IO metadata on ext4 Mel Gorman
2012-06-29 11:25   ` [MMTests] IO metadata on XFS Mel Gorman
2012-07-01 23:54     ` Dave Chinner
2012-07-02  6:32       ` Christoph Hellwig
2012-07-02 14:32         ` Mel Gorman [this message]
2012-07-02 19:35           ` Mel Gorman
2012-07-03  0:19             ` Dave Chinner
2012-07-03 10:59               ` Mel Gorman
2012-07-03 11:44                 ` Mel Gorman
2012-07-03 12:31                 ` Daniel Vetter
2012-07-03 13:08                   ` Mel Gorman
2012-07-03 13:28                   ` Eugeni Dodonov
2012-07-04  0:47                 ` Dave Chinner
2012-07-04  9:51                   ` Mel Gorman
2012-07-03 13:04             ` Mel Gorman
2012-07-03 14:04               ` Daniel Vetter
2012-07-02 13:30       ` Mel Gorman
2012-07-05 14:56   ` [MMTests] Interactivity during IO on ext3 Mel Gorman
2012-07-10  9:49     ` Jan Kara
2012-07-10 11:30       ` Mel Gorman
2012-07-05 14:57   ` [MMTests] Interactivity during IO on ext4 Mel Gorman
2012-07-23 21:21   ` [MMTests] dbench4 async on ext3 Mel Gorman
2012-08-16 14:52     ` Jan Kara
2012-08-21 22:00     ` Jan Kara
2012-08-22 10:48       ` Mel Gorman
2012-07-23 21:23   ` [MMTests] dbench4 async on ext4 Mel Gorman
2012-07-23 21:24   ` [MMTests] Threaded IO Performance on ext3 Mel Gorman
2012-07-23 21:25   ` [MMTests] Threaded IO Performance on xfs Mel Gorman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120702143215.GS14154@suse.de \
    --to=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).