* Asking for ACK/NAK on new new Btrfs cross subvolume reflink patch
@ 2012-07-03 10:39 Alexander Block
2012-07-03 12:13 ` Chris Mason
2012-07-03 16:13 ` Christoph Hellwig
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Alexander Block @ 2012-07-03 10:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: hch; +Cc: linux-fsdevel
Hello Christoph,
I'm writing directly to you (CC only to fsdevel to avoid discussions)
as we are waiting for a NAK/ACK from you on the
new cross subvolume reflink patch found in this mail:
http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-fsdevel/msg56262.html
I have the feeling that the new patch is what you asked for in the
first discussion, but I (and others from Btrfs)
don't want to add it without you approving it.
Thanks,
Alex
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Asking for ACK/NAK on new new Btrfs cross subvolume reflink patch
2012-07-03 10:39 Asking for ACK/NAK on new new Btrfs cross subvolume reflink patch Alexander Block
@ 2012-07-03 12:13 ` Chris Mason
2012-07-03 16:13 ` Christoph Hellwig
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Chris Mason @ 2012-07-03 12:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alexander Block; +Cc: hch@infradead.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
On Tue, Jul 03, 2012 at 04:39:22AM -0600, Alexander Block wrote:
> Hello Christoph,
>
> I'm writing directly to you (CC only to fsdevel to avoid discussions)
> as we are waiting for a NAK/ACK from you on the
> new cross subvolume reflink patch found in this mail:
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-fsdevel/msg56262.html
> I have the feeling that the new patch is what you asked for in the
> first discussion, but I (and others from Btrfs)
> don't want to add it without you approving it.
I do plan on tacking this one, sharing extents across subvols is really
just an internal part of btrfs. They are separate files, and so there's
no higher level impact.
-chris
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Asking for ACK/NAK on new new Btrfs cross subvolume reflink patch
2012-07-03 10:39 Asking for ACK/NAK on new new Btrfs cross subvolume reflink patch Alexander Block
2012-07-03 12:13 ` Chris Mason
@ 2012-07-03 16:13 ` Christoph Hellwig
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Hellwig @ 2012-07-03 16:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alexander Block; +Cc: hch, linux-fsdevel
On Tue, Jul 03, 2012 at 12:39:22PM +0200, Alexander Block wrote:
> Hello Christoph,
>
> I'm writing directly to you (CC only to fsdevel to avoid discussions)
> as we are waiting for a NAK/ACK from you on the
> new cross subvolume reflink patch found in this mail:
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-fsdevel/msg56262.html
> I have the feeling that the new patch is what you asked for in the
> first discussion, but I (and others from Btrfs)
> don't want to add it without you approving it.
Go for it, the whole btrfs subvolume user interface is so badly fucked
that this won't make it substancially worse.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-07-03 16:13 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-07-03 10:39 Asking for ACK/NAK on new new Btrfs cross subvolume reflink patch Alexander Block
2012-07-03 12:13 ` Chris Mason
2012-07-03 16:13 ` Christoph Hellwig
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).