From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chris Mason Subject: Re: Asking for ACK/NAK on new new Btrfs cross subvolume reflink patch Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2012 08:13:04 -0400 Message-ID: <20120703121304.GB14928@shiny> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Cc: "hch@infradead.org" , "linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" To: Alexander Block Return-path: Received: from mx2.fusionio.com ([66.114.96.31]:37390 "EHLO mx2.fusionio.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751168Ab2GCMXf (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Jul 2012 08:23:35 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, Jul 03, 2012 at 04:39:22AM -0600, Alexander Block wrote: > Hello Christoph, > > I'm writing directly to you (CC only to fsdevel to avoid discussions) > as we are waiting for a NAK/ACK from you on the > new cross subvolume reflink patch found in this mail: > http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-fsdevel/msg56262.html > I have the feeling that the new patch is what you asked for in the > first discussion, but I (and others from Btrfs) > don't want to add it without you approving it. I do plan on tacking this one, sharing extents across subvols is really just an internal part of btrfs. They are separate files, and so there's no higher level impact. -chris