From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: Asking for ACK/NAK on new new Btrfs cross subvolume reflink patch
Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2012 12:13:04 -0400
Message-ID: <20120703161304.GA4777@infradead.org>
References: <CAB9VWqAen0qmwNg1F9mTB2Ft9jbMjGoRWd2-=JXkY1VKyV6V3A@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: hch@infradead.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
To: Alexander Block <ablock84@googlemail.com>
Return-path: <linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from 173-166-109-252-newengland.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([173.166.109.252]:43737
	"EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK)
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754050Ab2GCQNG (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 3 Jul 2012 12:13:06 -0400
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAB9VWqAen0qmwNg1F9mTB2Ft9jbMjGoRWd2-=JXkY1VKyV6V3A@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org>

On Tue, Jul 03, 2012 at 12:39:22PM +0200, Alexander Block wrote:
> Hello Christoph,
> 
> I'm writing directly to you (CC only to fsdevel to avoid discussions)
> as we are waiting for a NAK/ACK from you on the
> new cross subvolume reflink patch found in this mail:
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-fsdevel/msg56262.html
> I have the feeling that the new patch is what you asked for in the
> first discussion, but I (and others from Btrfs)
> don't want to add it without you approving it.

Go for it, the whole btrfs subvolume user interface is so badly fucked
that this won't make it substancially worse.