From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@openvz.org>
Subject: Re: [rfc 3/7] procfs: Add ability to plugin auxiliary fdinfo
 providers
Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2012 11:50:20 +0400
Message-ID: <20120704075020.GC1999@moon>
References: <20120627110116.201735815@openvz.org>
 <20120627110512.574379921@openvz.org>
 <4FF3F332.5030302@parallels.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>,
	Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	James Bottomley <jbottomley@parallels.com>
To: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@parallels.com>
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4FF3F332.5030302@parallels.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org

On Wed, Jul 04, 2012 at 11:39:30AM +0400, Pavel Emelyanov wrote:
> 
> How about introducing one more file_operations member and call it in the
> seq_show() (if exists)? Only inotify, eventfd and eventpoll will implement
> one. This will allow to avoid all this complexity with drivers.

Hmm. Thanks for idea, I need to estimate which impact it will have. Will ping
back once it's done.

	Cyrill