From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Cyrill Gorcunov Subject: Re: [rfc 2/7] procfs: Convert /proc/pid/fdinfo/ handling routines to seq-file Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2012 12:03:45 +0400 Message-ID: <20120704080345.GD1999@moon> References: <20120627110116.201735815@openvz.org> <20120627110512.485189390@openvz.org> <4FF3F2B6.5040909@parallels.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" , Al Viro , Alexey Dobriyan , Andrew Morton , James Bottomley To: Pavel Emelyanov Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4FF3F2B6.5040909@parallels.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jul 04, 2012 at 11:37:26AM +0400, Pavel Emelyanov wrote: > > > > -static ssize_t proc_fdinfo_read(struct file *file, char __user *buf, > > - size_t len, loff_t *ppos) > > -{ > > - char tmp[PROC_FDINFO_MAX]; > > - int err = proc_fd_info(file->f_path.dentry->d_inode, NULL, tmp); > > - if (!err) > > - err = simple_read_from_buffer(buf, len, ppos, tmp, strlen(tmp)); > > - return err; > > -} > > - > > I believe we can still have the proc_fdinfo_read and proc_fd_link code non-splitted. > Just push a callback pointer ino the proc_fd_info (as usual -- we an opaque void *argument). Thanks! Will try. Cyrill