linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: majianpeng <majianpeng@gmail.com>
To: konrad.wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
Cc: axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, shaggy <shaggy@kernel.org>,
	"chris.mason" <chris.mason@fusionio.com>,
	elder <elder@kernel.org>, tytso <tytso@mit.edu>,
	ocfs2-devel <ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com>,
	mfasheh <mfasheh@suse.com>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	xfs <xfs@oss.sgi.com>, bpm <bpm@sgi.com>,
	"adilger.kernel" <adilger.kernel@dilger.ca>,
	viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>,
	jfs-discussion <jfs-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net>,
	linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-ext4 <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-btrfs <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>,
	jlbec <jlbec@evilplan.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] Set bi_rw when alloc bio before call bio_add_page.
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2012 08:42:57 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201207310842549068542@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20120730153935.GE4547@phenom.dumpdata.com

On 2012-07-30 23:39 Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com> Wrote:
>On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 03:14:28PM +0800, majianpeng wrote:
>> When exec bio_alloc, the bi_rw is zero.But after calling bio_add_page,
>
>What about submit_bio? That sets the bi_rw as well?
>> it will use bi_rw.
>> Fox example, in functiion __bio_add_page,it will call merge_bvec_fn().
>
>function.
>> The merge_bvec_fn of raid456 will use the bi_rw to judge the merge.
>> >> if ((bvm->bi_rw & 1) == WRITE)
>> >> return biovec->bv_len; /* always allow writes to be mergeable */
>
>So what does that mean? Without this patch what happens?
>
Because bio_alloc, the bi_rw is zero default.But in __bio_add_page, it used bi_rw.
For example: if merge_bvce_fn used bi_rw, but the bi_rw is wrong(if bi_rw is not zero).
So the result may be error.
>> 
>> 
>> Jianpeng Ma (8):
>
>Can you collapse all of this in just one patch?
Sorry, I think those files are not a subsystem.So i should send separately.
>
>>   Evalue bio->bi_rw after calling bio_alloc() and before calling
>
>It is 'evaluate'
>>     bio_add_page().
>>   Evalue bio->bi_rw after calling bio_alloc() and before calling    
>>     bio_add_page().
>>   Evalue bio->bi_rw after calling bio_alloc() and before calling    
>>     bio_add_page().
>>   Evalue bio->bi_rw after calling bio_alloc() and before calling    
>>     bio_add_page().
>>   Evalue bio->bi_rw after calling bio_alloc() and before calling    
>>     bio_add_page().
>>   Evalue bio->bi_rw after calling bio_alloc() and before calling    
>>     bio_add_page().
>>   Evalue bio->bi_rw after calling bio_alloc() and before calling    
>>     bio_add_page().
>>   Evalue bio->bi_rw after calling bio_alloc() and before calling    
>>     bio_add_page().
>> 
>>  block/blk-lib.c                     |    1 +
>>  drivers/block/xen-blkback/blkback.c |    1 +
>
>I am not really sure if that is correct. Does 'submit_bio' not do the
>job properly?
Before call submit_bio, it call bio_add_page.
>
>>  fs/btrfs/check-integrity.c          |    1 +
>>  fs/direct-io.c                      |    1 +
>>  fs/ext4/page-io.c                   |    1 +
>>  fs/jfs/jfs_metapage.c               |    1 +
>>  fs/ocfs2/cluster/heartbeat.c        |    8 +++++---
>>  fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c                   |    2 ++
>>  fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c                    |    1 +
>>  9 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>> 
>> -- 
>> 1.7.9.5
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/

  reply	other threads:[~2012-07-31  0:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-07-30  7:14 [PATCH 0/8] Set bi_rw when alloc bio before call bio_add_page majianpeng
2012-07-30 15:39 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-07-31  0:42   ` majianpeng [this message]
2012-07-30 21:42 ` Dave Chinner
2012-07-31  0:55   ` majianpeng
2012-07-31  1:14     ` Dave Chinner
2012-08-10 15:23       ` Muthu Kumar
2012-08-10 15:29       ` Muthu Kumar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201207310842549068542@gmail.com \
    --to=majianpeng@gmail.com \
    --cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=bpm@sgi.com \
    --cc=chris.mason@fusionio.com \
    --cc=elder@kernel.org \
    --cc=jfs-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=jlbec@evilplan.org \
    --cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mfasheh@suse.com \
    --cc=ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com \
    --cc=shaggy@kernel.org \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    --cc=viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).