From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Al Viro Subject: Re: mq: INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2012 07:39:55 +0100 Message-ID: <20120807063955.GX23464@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> References: <501D0093.2090108@gmail.com> <20120805170856.GC8954@localhost> <20120807050412.GA23960@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Sasha Levin , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Dave Jones , Kamal Mostafa , "Peter M. Petrakis" , Dann Frazier , Massimo Morana , Jan Kara , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org To: Fengguang Wu Return-path: Received: from zeniv.linux.org.uk ([195.92.253.2]:38042 "EHLO ZenIV.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750730Ab2HGGj7 (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Aug 2012 02:39:59 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120807050412.GA23960@localhost> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, Aug 07, 2012 at 01:04:12PM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote: > FYI, here is a different back trace on that commit. > > [ 3.255043] ====================================================== > [ 3.255052] [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ] > [ 3.255052] 3.5.0-rc6-bisect-00355-geb04c28 #4 Not tainted > [ 3.255052] ------------------------------------------------------- > [ 3.255052] init/1 is trying to acquire lock: > [ 3.255052] (&mm->mmap_sem){++++++}, at: [] might_fault+0x70/0xe0 > [ 3.255052] > [ 3.255052] but task is already holding lock: > [ 3.255052] (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key){+.+.+.}, at: [] vfs_readdir+0x6e/0x130 Do you see any similar with the _next_ commit?