From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Al Viro Subject: Re: [patch 3/8] procfs: Add ability to plug in auxiliary fdinfo providers Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2012 01:07:03 +0100 Message-ID: <20120815000703.GL23464@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> References: <20120814140342.354405844@openvz.org> <20120814140620.033884909@openvz.org> <20120814183142.GH23464@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <20120814183558.GA1551@moon> <20120814195649.GB31043@moon> <20120814212721.GJ23464@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <20120814215616.GC31043@moon> <20120814222147.GA21674@moon> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Alexey Dobriyan , Andrew Morton , Pavel Emelyanov , James Bottomley , Matthew Helsley To: Cyrill Gorcunov Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120814222147.GA21674@moon> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 02:21:47AM +0400, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote: > > Hmm, in very first versions I've been using one ->show method, but > > then I thought that this is not very correlate with seq-files idea > > where for each record show/next sequence is called. I'll update (this > > for sure will make code simplier, and I'll have to check for seq-file > > overflow after seq_printf call to not continue printing data for too > > long if buffer already out of space). > > Al, I'll cook the whole series tomorrow and resend it for review, > also I guess the new show_fdinfo() member in file-operations should > be guarded with CONFIG_PROC_FS, right? I seriously doubt that it's worth bothering. If somebody cares, they can add making it conditional later.