* Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] Documentation: add description of dirty_background_centisecs
[not found] <1347798364-2864-1-git-send-email-linkinjeon@gmail.com>
@ 2012-09-20 8:45 ` Fengguang Wu
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Fengguang Wu @ 2012-09-20 8:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Namjae Jeon
Cc: Jan Kara, Dave Chinner, linux-kernel, Namjae Jeon, Vivek Trivedi,
Linux Memory Management List, linux-fsdevel
[ add CC ]
On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 08:26:04AM -0400, Namjae Jeon wrote:
> From: Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@samsung.com>
>
> This commit adds dirty_background_centisecs description in bdi sysfs
> documentation.
>
> Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@samsung.com>
> Signed-off-by: Vivek Trivedi <t.vivek@samsung.com>
> ---
> Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-class-bdi | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-class-bdi b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-class-bdi
> index 5f50097..6869736 100644
> --- a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-class-bdi
> +++ b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-class-bdi
> @@ -48,3 +48,28 @@ max_ratio (read-write)
> most of the write-back cache. For example in case of an NFS
> mount that is prone to get stuck, or a FUSE mount which cannot
> be trusted to play fair.
> +
> +dirty_background_centisecs (read-write)
> +
> + It is used to start early writeback of given bdi once bdi dirty
> + data exceeds product of average write bandwidth and
> + dirty_background_centisecs. It works in parallel of
> + dirty_writeback_centsecs and dirty_expire_interval based periodic
> + flushing mechanism.
> +
> + It is mainly useful for tuning writeback speed at 'NFS Server'
> + sothat NFS client could see better write speed.
> + A good use case is setting it to around 100 (1 second) in the NFS
> + server for improving NFS write performance. Note that it's not
> + recommended to set it to a too small value, which might lead to
> + unnecessary flushing for small IO size.
> + Setting it to 0 disables the feature.
> +
> + However, sometimes it may not match user expectations as it is based
> + on bdi write bandwidth estimation. The users should not expect this
> + threshold to work accurately.
> + Write bandwidth estimation is a best effort to estimate bdi write
> + speed bandwidth. But it can be wildly wrong in certain situations
> + such as sudden change of workload (including the workload startup
> + stage), or if there are no heavy writes since boot, in which case
> + there is no reasonable estimation yet.
> --
> 1.7.9.5
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread