From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: Fernando Luis Vazquez Cao <fernando_b1@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fsfreeze: tell hung_task about processes put to sleep
Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2012 17:36:09 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121015063608.GW2739@dastard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <507B820B.3000908@lab.ntt.co.jp>
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 12:24:59PM +0900, Fernando Luis Vazquez Cao wrote:
> On 2012/10/13 10:06, Dave Chinner wrote:
> >On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 06:47:32PM +0900, Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao wrote:
> >>Any process attempting to write to a frozen filesystem uninterruptibly and
> >>unkillably waits for the filesystem to be thawed. This wait is of unbounded
> >>length. Ignore such waits in the hung_task detector.
> >Filesystems should not be frozen for long enough to trigger the hung
> >task detector under normal usage. IMO, if you are freezing a
> >filesystem for that long, then you're either doing something wrong
> >or something has gone wrong, and in either case I think we should be
> >emitting warnings...
>
> The problem is that in production systems situations where
> a filesystem remains brozen for long periods are not uncommon.
> A typical example is as follows: the control daemon or script that
> controls the freeze/thaw using the fsfreeze ioctls dies, the next
There's your problem. Fix that, don't turn off useful warnings that
indicate something has gone wrong.
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-10-15 6:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-12 9:47 [PATCH] fsfreeze: tell hung_task about processes put to sleep Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao
2012-10-13 1:06 ` Dave Chinner
2012-10-15 3:24 ` Fernando Luis Vazquez Cao
2012-10-15 6:36 ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2012-10-15 6:51 ` Fernando Luis Vazquez Cao
2012-10-15 21:02 ` Dave Chinner
2012-10-16 2:30 ` Fernando Luis Vazquez Cao
2012-10-16 4:52 ` Dave Chinner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20121015063608.GW2739@dastard \
--to=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=fernando_b1@lab.ntt.co.jp \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).