Re: [PATCH] cifs: don't call cifs_lookup from atomic open with a hashed negative dentry

[Jeff Layton <jlayton-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>]

On Sat, 20 Oct 2012 20:44:42 -0400
Jeff Layton <jlayton-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> wrote:

> The following oops was reported by Vit Zahradka. The BUG is this in
> __d_rehash():
> 
>     BUG_ON(!d_unhashed(entry));
> 
> :kernel BUG at fs/dcache.c:2138!
> :invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP
> :Modules linked in: fuse ebtable_nat ebtables ipt_MASQUERADE iptable_nat
> nf_nat des_generic xt_CHECKSUM iptable_mangle md4 bridge stp llc nls_utf8
> cifs dns_resolver fscache lockd sunrpc rfcomm bnep be2iscsi
> iscsi_boot_sysfs bnx2i cnic uio cxgb4i cxgb4 cxgb3i cxgb3 mdio libcxgbi
> ib_iser rdma_cm ib_addr iw_cm ib_cm ib_sa ib_mad ib_core iscsi_tcp
> libiscsi_tcp libiscsi scsi_transport_iscsi ip6t_REJECT nf_conntrack_ipv6
> nf_defrag_ipv6 ip6table_filter ip6_tables nf_conntrack_ipv4 nf_defrag_ipv4
> xt_state nf_conntrack snd_hda_codec_conexant btusb bluetooth snd_hda_intel
> snd_hda_codec snd_hwdep snd_seq snd_seq_device snd_pcm thinkpad_acpi
> snd_page_alloc arc4 snd_timer iwldvm mac80211 iwlwifi cfg80211 uvcvideo
> videobuf2_vmalloc videobuf2_memops videobuf2_core videodev snd media rfkill
> soundcore i2c_i801 mei r592 memstick iTCO_wdt iTCO_vendor_support lpc_ich
> tg3 coretemp microcode ppdev parport_pc parport vhost_net tun macvtap
> macvlan kvm_intel kvm uinput binfmt_misc firewire_oh
> :ci firewire_core crc_itu_t sdhci_pci sdhci mmc_core yenta_socket wmi video
> radeon i2c_algo_bit drm_kms_helper ttm drm i2c_core
> :Pid: 2219, comm: eclipse Not tainted 3.6.1-1.fc17.i686 #1 LENOVO
> 27326FG/27326FG
> :EIP: 0060:[<c0557577>] EFLAGS: 00010282 CPU: 1
> :EIP is at __d_rehash+0x57/0x60
> :EAX: ee641c80 EBX: 0000096a ECX: f7338208 EDX: f7338208
> :ESI: fffffffe EDI: f6339f60 EBP: f0481d84 ESP: f0481d80
> : DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 00d8 GS: 00e0 SS: 0068
> :CR0: 8005003b CR2: 06567f84 CR3: 30710000 CR4: 000027d0
> :DR0: 00000000 DR1: 00000000 DR2: 00000000 DR3: 00000000
> :DR6: ffff0ff0 DR7: 00000400
> :Process eclipse (pid: 2219, ti=f0480000 task=f0490c90 task.ti=f0480000)
> :Stack:
> : 0000096a f0481d90 c05575b2 ee641c80 f0481d9c c05575da 00000000 f0481dd8
> : f9c01e32 f0734000 00004213 00000000 f0734000 f0481df4 f11ce600 00004213
> : f6b07c60 00000000 00000000 f0481ef8 ee641c80 ef1781e0 f0481e20 f9c01f52
> :Call Trace:
> : [<c05575b2>] _d_rehash+0x32/0x40
> : [<c05575da>] d_rehash+0x1a/0x30
> : [<f9c01e32>] cifs_lookup+0x212/0x300 [cifs]
> : [<f9c01f52>] cifs_atomic_open+0x32/0x200 [cifs]
> : [<c05584bf>] ? d_lookup+0x2f/0x50
> : [<c055074c>] do_last+0x42c/0xbd0
> : [<c054dd8c>] ? link_path_walk+0x1dc/0x750
> : [<c0550f8d>] path_openat+0x9d/0x3b0
> : [<c046d47f>] ? wake_up_state+0xf/0x20
> : [<c0490ed2>] ? wake_futex+0x32/0x50
> : [<c046fcb5>] ? __dequeue_entity+0x25/0x40
> : [<c0551481>] do_filp_open+0x31/0x80
> : [<c055bdfc>] ? alloc_fd+0x3c/0xe0
> : [<c054c970>] ? getname_flags+0x40/0xd0
> : [<c0542885>] do_sys_open+0xe5/0x1c0
> : [<c05429d0>] sys_openat+0x30/0x40
> : [<c095addf>] sysenter_do_call+0x12/0x28
> :Code: 48 08 74 03 89 59 04 f6 c3 01 89 50 0c 75 20 f6 02 01 74 19 83 cb 01
> 89 1a 0f ba 32 00 5b 5d c3 f3 90 8b 0a 80 e1 01 75 f7 eb b9 <0f> 0b 0f 0b
> 0f 0b 8d 76 00 55 89 e5 53 66 66 66 66 90 8b 0d fc
> :EIP: [<c0557577>] __d_rehash+0x57/0x60 SS:ESP 0068:f0481d80
> 
> I think what happened is something like the following:
> 
> openat() was called on the file without O_CREAT. A negative dentry was
> already in the cache, and was successfully revalidated. At that point a
> hashed, negative dentry was passed to cifs_atomic_open. Since O_CREAT
> wasn't set, it punted it over to cifs_lookup which did a lookup and then
> tried to rehash the result and tripped over the bug.
> 
> Fix this by simply returning -ENOENT in this case instead of calling
> cifs_lookup. For the longer term, I think cifs_atomic_open could use
> some cleanup. There is probably no reason to limit atomic opens to the
> O_CREAT case.
> 
> Cc: <stable-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org> # 3.6.x
> Reported-and-Tested-by: Vit Zahradka <vit.zahradka-IWqWACnzNjzrBKCeMvbIDA@public.gmane.org>
> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
> ---

Steve,

It turns out that Marcus has hit an issue with this patch in place that
we don't fully understand yet:

    https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=867344#c25

I've asked Sachin to take a look, but it might be best to hold off on
pushing this to Linus until we understand the problem there.

Thanks,
-- 
Jeff Layton <jlayton-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>