From: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
To: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@panasas.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>,
linux-ext4 <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] bdi: Create a flag to indicate that a backing device needs stable page writes
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2012 22:51:09 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121101055109.GD19576@blackbox.djwong.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5091B075.7030608@panasas.com>
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 04:12:53PM -0700, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
> On 10/31/2012 12:36 PM, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 12:56:14PM +0100, Jan Kara wrote:
> <snip>
> >> You are right that we need a mechanism to push the flags from the devices
> >> through various storage layers up into the bdi filesystem sees to make
> >> things reliable.
> >
> > md/dm will call blk_integrity_register, so pushing the "stable page writes
> > required" flag through the various layers is already taken care of. If devices
> > and filesystems can both indicate that they want stable page writes, I'll have
> > to keep track of however many users there are.
> >
>
> Please note again the iscsi case. Say the admin defined half of an md iscsi devices
> with data_integrity and half without.
>
> For me I would like an OR. If any underline device needs "stable pages" they all
> get them.
>
> Please also provide - or how easy is to make an API - for the like of iscsi that
> given a request_queue, set the BDI's "stable pages" on. Something like:
>
> /* stable_pages can only be turned on never off */
> blk_set_stable_pages(struct request_queue);
I'll have to test this further, but I think at least DM requires that a given
dm device's sub-devices all have the same integrity profile, which atm seems to
imply that stable writes will be turned on for everything or not at all.
Of course, all that goes out the door with iscsi since it doesn't necessarily
care about DIF/DIX but wants stable pages anyway. It'd be useful to be able to
play around with iscsi too. Could you point me to where in the iscsi code it
does the copy-and-checksum behavior?
--D
> > It does seem like less work to fix all the filesystems than to dork around with
> > another flag.
>
> Sure if that is possible, that will be perfect, then I do not need to keep
> the old "unstable pages" code around at all.
>
> Thanks for working on this
> Boaz
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-11-01 5:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-26 10:19 semi-stable page writes Darrick J. Wong
2012-10-27 1:35 ` [RFC PATCH 1/2] bdi: Create a flag to indicate that a backing device needs stable " Darrick J. Wong
2012-10-29 18:13 ` Jan Kara
2012-10-29 18:30 ` Jan Kara
2012-10-29 23:48 ` NeilBrown
2012-10-30 0:10 ` Jan Kara
2012-10-30 0:34 ` NeilBrown
2012-10-30 13:38 ` Jan Kara
2012-10-30 21:49 ` NeilBrown
2012-10-30 4:10 ` Martin K. Petersen
2012-10-30 4:48 ` NeilBrown
2012-10-30 12:19 ` Martin K. Petersen
2012-10-30 20:14 ` Darrick J. Wong
2012-10-30 22:14 ` NeilBrown
2012-10-30 23:58 ` Boaz Harrosh
2012-10-31 8:56 ` Darrick J. Wong
2012-10-31 11:56 ` Jan Kara
2012-10-31 19:36 ` Darrick J. Wong
2012-10-31 23:12 ` Boaz Harrosh
2012-11-01 5:51 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2012-11-01 6:25 ` Boaz Harrosh
2012-11-01 8:59 ` Jan Kara
2012-11-01 17:24 ` Boaz Harrosh
2012-11-01 22:42 ` Jan Kara
2012-10-30 22:40 ` Boaz Harrosh
2012-10-27 1:36 ` [RFC PATCH 2/2] mm: Gate stable page writes on the bdi flag Darrick J. Wong
2012-10-29 18:28 ` Jan Kara
2012-10-31 8:58 ` Darrick J. Wong
2012-10-29 22:01 ` semi-stable page writes Dave Chinner
2012-10-30 1:00 ` Theodore Ts'o
2012-10-30 23:30 ` Dave Chinner
2012-10-31 11:45 ` Jan Kara
2012-10-30 20:40 ` Darrick J. Wong
2012-10-30 23:43 ` Dave Chinner
2012-10-31 9:05 ` Darrick J. Wong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20121101055109.GD19576@blackbox.djwong.org \
--to=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
--cc=bharrosh@panasas.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).