From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs: revert commit bbdd6808 to fallocate UAPI Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2012 11:36:31 -0500 Message-ID: <20121120163631.GA18034@infradead.org> References: <1353366267-15629-1-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: torvalds@linux-foundation.org, tytso@mit.edu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org To: Dave Chinner Return-path: Received: from 173-166-109-252-newengland.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([173.166.109.252]:51801 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751804Ab2KTQge (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Nov 2012 11:36:34 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1353366267-15629-1-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 10:04:27AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: > The method of pushing of such a commit (i.e. written, committed and > pushed by a tree maintainer as part of a larger subsystem merge) > could be seen as designed to avoid review and discussion of a > controversial change that is likely to be NAKed. A long-term > subsystem maintainer should know better than to push changes in this > manner. Agreed, this needs to be reverted. Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig