From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Subject: Re: Recent kernel "mount" slow
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2012 19:09:49 +0100
Message-ID: <20121120180949.GG1408@quack.suse.cz>
References: <CAAJw_ZtbhE5Jtd4PsWx8a23QdFTW7aMrKBmRf-bo5Wrean9Xhg@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
To: Jeff Chua <jeff.chua.linux@gmail.com>
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAAJw_ZtbhE5Jtd4PsWx8a23QdFTW7aMrKBmRf-bo5Wrean9Xhg@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org

On Mon 19-11-12 08:33:25, Jeff Chua wrote:
> It seems the recent kernel is slower mounting hard disk than older
> kernels. I've not bisect down to exact when this happen as it might
> already been reported or solved. I'm on the latest commit, but it
> doesn't seems to be fixed yet.
> 
> commit 3587b1b097d70c2eb9fee95ea7995d13c05f66e5
> Author: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
> Date:   Sun Nov 18 19:19:00 2012 +0000
> 
>     fanotify: fix FAN_Q_OVERFLOW case of fanotify_read()
  I haven't heard about such problem so far. What filesystem are you using?
Can you quantify 'is slower'? Bisecting would be welcome of course.

								Honza
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
SUSE Labs, CR