From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Martin Steigerwald <Martin@lichtvoll.de>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH, 3.7-rc7, RESEND] fs: revert commit bbdd6808 to fallocate UAPI
Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2012 12:14:02 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121206011402.GB27172@dastard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+55aFxsPBo4TZEPq+14NBE8Snmd9qiTjAiEP0fFXBzaJ9y+gw@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Dec 05, 2012 at 10:25:17AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> Yes, people can argue that "process" is about technical issues too,
> but let's be honest: our process is fluid. Not everything gets
> reviewed on the mailing list, and people *do* talk about things
> face-to-face at conferences.
Yes, that is true.
But we don't review code at conferences. We have mailing lists for
that. I've lost count of the number of times I've heard "post your
code" or "let's take it to the list" or "better to discuss this on
the list where everyone can comment" at conferences such as
Plumbers. It's a standard practise - talk at conferences, review
on mailing lists.
And for changes to syscalls? That's something that must be peer
reviewed because we are going to be stuck with those changes forever
as we can't undo them at a later date. It doesn't matter who made the
change in question, I would have done exactly the same thing....
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-12-06 1:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 69+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-11-19 23:04 [PATCH] fs: revert commit bbdd6808 to fallocate UAPI Dave Chinner
2012-11-20 16:36 ` Christoph Hellwig
2012-11-26 0:28 ` [PATCH, 3.7-rc7, RESEND] " Dave Chinner
2012-11-26 2:55 ` Theodore Ts'o
2012-11-26 6:14 ` Tao Ma
2012-11-26 9:12 ` Dave Chinner
2012-12-05 10:48 ` Martin Steigerwald
2012-12-05 15:45 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-12-05 16:18 ` Martin Steigerwald
2012-12-05 16:33 ` Theodore Ts'o
2012-12-05 17:24 ` Martin Steigerwald
2012-12-05 17:34 ` Theodore Ts'o
2012-12-05 17:55 ` Martin Steigerwald
2012-12-06 0:42 ` Dave Chinner
2012-12-06 9:24 ` Martin Steigerwald
2012-12-05 18:25 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-12-06 1:14 ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2012-12-06 3:03 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-12-06 9:37 ` Martin Steigerwald
2012-12-07 1:08 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-12-07 2:40 ` Dave Chinner
2012-12-07 10:24 ` Martin Steigerwald
2012-12-06 12:06 ` Christoph Hellwig
2012-12-06 16:50 ` Theodore Ts'o
2012-12-07 1:57 ` Dave Chinner
2012-12-06 12:05 ` Christoph Hellwig
2012-12-07 1:16 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-12-07 3:19 ` Dave Chinner
2012-12-07 17:36 ` Ric Wheeler
2012-12-07 18:18 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-12-07 19:03 ` Chris Mason
2012-12-07 20:43 ` Theodore Ts'o
2012-12-07 21:09 ` Chris Mason
2012-12-07 21:27 ` Theodore Ts'o
2012-12-07 21:43 ` Chris Mason
2012-12-07 21:49 ` Ric Wheeler
2012-12-07 21:57 ` Chris Mason
2012-12-07 22:51 ` Eric Sandeen
2012-12-07 22:52 ` Eric Sandeen
2012-12-07 21:42 ` Ric Wheeler
2012-12-07 21:57 ` Theodore Ts'o
2012-12-07 22:02 ` Ric Wheeler
2012-12-08 0:39 ` Dave Chinner
2012-12-08 2:52 ` Joel Becker
2012-12-08 4:04 ` Dave Chinner
2012-12-08 0:17 ` Dave Chinner
2012-12-08 1:39 ` Chris Mason
2012-12-10 16:02 ` Chris Mason
2012-12-10 17:37 ` Theodore Ts'o
2012-12-10 18:05 ` Steven Whitehouse
2012-12-10 18:13 ` Theodore Ts'o
2012-12-10 18:20 ` Theodore Ts'o
2012-12-11 12:16 ` Steven Whitehouse
2012-12-11 22:09 ` Dave Chinner
2012-12-10 18:52 ` Ric Wheeler
2012-12-11 0:52 ` Dave Chinner
2012-12-07 19:30 ` Steven Rostedt
2012-12-07 21:14 ` Theodore Ts'o
2012-12-07 21:47 ` Ric Wheeler
2012-12-07 23:25 ` Howard Chu
2012-12-08 0:50 ` Dave Chinner
2012-12-08 13:52 ` Howard Chu
2012-12-08 14:02 ` Ric Wheeler
2012-12-07 22:01 ` Eric Sandeen
2012-12-09 21:37 ` Ric Wheeler
2012-11-26 11:53 ` Alan Cox
2012-11-26 14:43 ` Theodore Ts'o
2012-11-26 21:12 ` Dave Chinner
2012-11-27 13:44 ` Martin Steigerwald
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20121206011402.GB27172@dastard \
--to=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=Martin@lichtvoll.de \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox