linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: Andreas Dilger <adilger@whamcloud.com>
Cc: yangsheng <sickamd@gmail.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"stable@vger.kernel.org" <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
	"adilger@dilger.ca" <adilger@dilger.ca>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Update atime from future.
Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2012 11:49:10 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121207004910.GD27172@dastard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <424C1F3A-E96F-485B-BAE5-02CE41C0DBFF@whamcloud.com>

On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 05:22:32PM -0700, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> The point is that the behaviour before the relatime patch was that
> the kernel updated the atime to the current time as the kernel
> knows about it, it didn't make any decision about "the past" or
> "the future".
> 
> Relatime is about reducing the frequency of atime updates, not
> about deciding that one timestamp is more correct than another. 

That makes sense.

Indeed, that's what the commit message should say rather than
drawing arbitrary lines in the sand about what is a valid atime
without further justification.

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com

  reply	other threads:[~2012-12-07  0:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-12-03 17:56 [PATCH] Update atime from future yangsheng
2012-12-03 18:08 ` Greg KH
2012-12-04 19:41 ` Zach Brown
2012-12-04 20:24 ` Dave Chinner
2012-12-05  0:22   ` Andreas Dilger
2012-12-07  0:49     ` Dave Chinner [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-01-04  9:08 yangsheng
2010-12-29 13:58 yangsheng
2011-01-03 10:17 ` Andrew Morton
2011-01-03 12:54   ` YangSheng
2011-01-04 14:56   ` Rogier Wolff
2011-01-03 10:27 ` Steven Whitehouse
2011-01-03 16:27   ` Andreas Dilger
2011-01-03 16:41     ` Steven Whitehouse
2011-01-03 16:44   ` YangSheng
2011-01-11 13:33   ` Pavel Machek
2011-01-13 14:18     ` Steven Whitehouse

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20121207004910.GD27172@dastard \
    --to=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=adilger@dilger.ca \
    --cc=adilger@whamcloud.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sickamd@gmail.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).