From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Cc: axboe@kernel.dk, lucho@ionkov.net, jack@suse.cz,
ericvh@gmail.com, tytso@mit.edu, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk,
rminnich@sandia.gov, martin.petersen@oracle.com, neilb@suse.de,
david@fromorbit.com, gnehzuil.liu@gmail.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hch@infradead.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
adilger.kernel@dilger.ca, bharrosh@panasas.com,
jlayton@samba.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] block: Optionally snapshot page contents to provide stable pages during write
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2013 03:00:00 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130116020000.GA25806@quack.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130115054305.1563.48197.stgit@blackbox.djwong.org>
On Mon 14-01-13 21:43:05, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> This provides a band-aid to provide stable page writes on jbd without needing
> to backport the fixed locking and page writeback bit handling schemes of jbd2.
> The band-aid works by using bounce buffers to snapshot page contents instead of
> waiting.
>
> For those wondering about the ext3 bandage -- fixing the jbd locking (which was
> done as part of ext4dev years ago) is a lot of surgery, and setting
> PG_writeback on data pages when we actually hold the page lock dropped ext3
> performance by nearly an order of magnitude. If we're going to migrate iscsi
> and raid to use stable page writes, the complaints about high latency will
> likely return. We might as well centralize their page snapshotting thing to
> one place.
>
> Tested-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
> Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
> ---
> arch/tile/Kconfig | 6 ------
> block/blk-core.c | 8 +++++---
> fs/ext3/super.c | 1 +
> include/uapi/linux/fs.h | 1 +
> mm/Kconfig | 13 +++++++++++++
> mm/bounce.c | 47 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> mm/page-writeback.c | 4 ++++
> 7 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
>
> diff --git a/arch/tile/Kconfig b/arch/tile/Kconfig
> index 875d008..c671fda 100644
> --- a/arch/tile/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/tile/Kconfig
> @@ -410,12 +410,6 @@ config TILE_USB
> Provides USB host adapter support for the built-in EHCI and OHCI
> interfaces on TILE-Gx chips.
>
> -# USB OHCI needs the bounce pool since tilegx will often have more
> -# than 4GB of memory, but we don't currently use the IOTLB to present
> -# a 32-bit address to OHCI. So we need to use a bounce pool instead.
> -config NEED_BOUNCE_POOL
> - def_bool USB_OHCI_HCD
> -
> source "drivers/pci/hotplug/Kconfig"
>
> endmenu
> diff --git a/block/blk-core.c b/block/blk-core.c
> index c973249..277134c 100644
> --- a/block/blk-core.c
> +++ b/block/blk-core.c
> @@ -1474,6 +1474,11 @@ void blk_queue_bio(struct request_queue *q, struct bio *bio)
> */
> blk_queue_bounce(q, &bio);
>
> + if (bio_integrity_enabled(bio) && bio_integrity_prep(bio)) {
> + bio_endio(bio, -EIO);
> + return;
> + }
> +
> if (bio->bi_rw & (REQ_FLUSH | REQ_FUA)) {
> spin_lock_irq(q->queue_lock);
> where = ELEVATOR_INSERT_FLUSH;
> @@ -1714,9 +1719,6 @@ generic_make_request_checks(struct bio *bio)
> */
> blk_partition_remap(bio);
>
> - if (bio_integrity_enabled(bio) && bio_integrity_prep(bio))
> - goto end_io;
> -
Umm, why did you move this hunk?
> if (bio_check_eod(bio, nr_sectors))
> goto end_io;
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/fs.h b/include/uapi/linux/fs.h
> index 780d4c6..0144fbb 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/fs.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/fs.h
> @@ -69,6 +69,7 @@ struct inodes_stat_t {
> #define MS_REMOUNT 32 /* Alter flags of a mounted FS */
> #define MS_MANDLOCK 64 /* Allow mandatory locks on an FS */
> #define MS_DIRSYNC 128 /* Directory modifications are synchronous */
> +#define MS_SNAP_STABLE 256 /* Snapshot pages during writeback, if needed */
> #define MS_NOATIME 1024 /* Do not update access times. */
> #define MS_NODIRATIME 2048 /* Do not update directory access times */
> #define MS_BIND 4096
Please don't mix MS_SNAP_STABLE flag among flags passed by mount(2)
syscall. I think putting it at 1 << 27 might be acceptable. I remember
Al Viro saying something along the lines that kernel internal superblock
flags should be separated from those passed from userspace into a special
superblock entry but that's a different story I guess.
> diff --git a/mm/Kconfig b/mm/Kconfig
> index 278e3ab..7901d83 100644
> --- a/mm/Kconfig
> +++ b/mm/Kconfig
> @@ -258,6 +258,19 @@ config BOUNCE
> def_bool y
> depends on BLOCK && MMU && (ZONE_DMA || HIGHMEM)
>
> +# On the 'tile' arch, USB OHCI needs the bounce pool since tilegx will often
> +# have more than 4GB of memory, but we don't currently use the IOTLB to present
> +# a 32-bit address to OHCI. So we need to use a bounce pool instead.
> +#
> +# We also use the bounce pool to provide stable page writes for jbd. jbd
> +# initiates buffer writeback without locking the page or setting PG_writeback,
> +# and fixing that behavior (a second time; jbd2 doesn't have this problem) is
> +# a major rework effort. Instead, use the bounce buffer to snapshot pages
> +# (until jbd goes away). The only jbd user is ext3.
> +config NEED_BOUNCE_POOL
> + bool
> + default y if (TILE && USB_OHCI_HCD) || (BLK_DEV_INTEGRITY && JBD)
> +
> config NR_QUICK
> int
> depends on QUICKLIST
> diff --git a/mm/bounce.c b/mm/bounce.c
> index 0420867..a5b30f9 100644
> --- a/mm/bounce.c
> +++ b/mm/bounce.c
> @@ -178,8 +178,44 @@ static void bounce_end_io_read_isa(struct bio *bio, int err)
> __bounce_end_io_read(bio, isa_page_pool, err);
> }
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_NEED_BOUNCE_POOL
> +static int must_snapshot_stable_pages(struct bio *bio)
> +{
> + struct page *page;
> + struct backing_dev_info *bdi;
> + struct address_space *mapping;
> + struct bio_vec *from;
> + int i;
> +
> + if (bio_data_dir(bio) != WRITE)
> + return 0;
> +
> + /*
> + * Based on the first page that has a valid mapping, decide whether or
> + * not we have to employ bounce buffering to guarantee stable pages.
> + */
> + bio_for_each_segment(from, bio, i) {
> + page = from->bv_page;
> + mapping = page_mapping(page);
> + if (!mapping)
> + continue;
> + bdi = mapping->backing_dev_info;
> + if (!bdi_cap_stable_pages_required(bdi))
> + return 0;
> + return mapping->host->i_sb->s_flags & MS_SNAP_STABLE;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
How about using q->backing_dev_info for the
bdi_cap_stable_pages_required() check? It will be a fast path and this check
will be faster..
Honza
--
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
SUSE Labs, CR
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-01-16 2:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-01-15 5:42 [PATCH v2.4 0/3] mm/fs: Remove unnecessary waiting for stable pages Darrick J. Wong
2013-01-15 5:42 ` [PATCH 1/6] bdi: Allow block devices to say that they require stable page writes Darrick J. Wong
2013-01-15 5:42 ` [PATCH 2/6] mm: Only enforce stable page writes if the backing device requires it Darrick J. Wong
2013-01-15 10:19 ` Jan Kara
2013-01-15 10:59 ` Steven Whitehouse
2013-01-18 1:26 ` Darrick J. Wong
2013-01-15 5:42 ` [PATCH 3/6] 9pfs: Fix filesystem to wait for stable page writeback Darrick J. Wong
2013-01-15 5:43 ` [PATCH 4/6] block: Optionally snapshot page contents to provide stable pages during write Darrick J. Wong
2013-01-16 2:00 ` Jan Kara [this message]
2013-01-17 3:01 ` Darrick J. Wong
2013-01-17 3:26 ` Martin K. Petersen
2013-01-17 10:32 ` Jan Kara
2013-01-15 5:43 ` [PATCH 5/6] ocfs2: Wait for page writeback to provide stable pages Darrick J. Wong
2013-01-15 10:15 ` Jan Kara
2013-01-15 5:43 ` [PATCH 6/6] ubifs: " Darrick J. Wong
2013-01-15 22:46 ` [PATCH v2.4 0/3] mm/fs: Remove unnecessary waiting for " Andrew Morton
2013-01-16 0:22 ` Darrick J. Wong
2013-01-16 0:33 ` Andrew Morton
2013-01-17 2:49 ` Darrick J. Wong
2013-01-17 4:43 ` Andrew Morton
2013-01-18 1:18 ` Darrick J. Wong
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-01-19 1:12 [PATCH v2.5 " Darrick J. Wong
2013-01-19 1:13 ` [PATCH 4/6] block: Optionally snapshot page contents to provide stable pages during write Darrick J. Wong
2013-01-21 14:12 ` Jan Kara
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130116020000.GA25806@quack.suse.cz \
--to=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=bharrosh@panasas.com \
--cc=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=ericvh@gmail.com \
--cc=gnehzuil.liu@gmail.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp \
--cc=jlayton@samba.org \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lucho@ionkov.net \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=rminnich@sandia.gov \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).