From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] lib: Implement range locks
Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2013 17:41:42 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130204164142.GG7523@quack.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130131155726.05d09b21.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
On Thu 31-01-13 15:57:26, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 31 Jan 2013 22:49:49 +0100
> Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> wrote:
>
> > Implement range locking using interval tree.
> >
> > ...
> >
> > +void range_lock(struct range_lock_tree *tree, struct range_lock *lock)
> > +{
> > + struct interval_tree_node *node;
> > + unsigned long flags;
> > +
> > + spin_lock_irqsave(&tree->lock, flags);
> > + node = interval_tree_iter_first(&tree->root, lock->node.start,
> > + lock->node.last);
> > + while (node) {
> > + lock->blocking_ranges++;
> > + node = interval_tree_iter_next(node, lock->node.start,
> > + lock->node.last);
> > + }
> > + interval_tree_insert(&lock->node, &tree->root);
> > + /* Do we need to go to sleep? */
> > + while (lock->blocking_ranges) {
> > + lock->task = current;
> > + __set_current_state(TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
> > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&tree->lock, flags);
> > + schedule();
> > + spin_lock_irqsave(&tree->lock, flags);
> > + }
> > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&tree->lock, flags);
> > +}
> >
> > ...
> >
> > +void range_unlock(struct range_lock_tree *tree, struct range_lock *lock)
> > +{
> > + struct interval_tree_node *node;
> > + unsigned long flags;
> > +
> > + spin_lock_irqsave(&tree->lock, flags);
> > + interval_tree_remove(&lock->node, &tree->root);
> > + node = interval_tree_iter_first(&tree->root, lock->node.start,
> > + lock->node.last);
> > + while (node) {
> > + range_lock_unblock((struct range_lock *)node);
> > + node = interval_tree_iter_next(node, lock->node.start,
> > + lock->node.last);
> > + }
> > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&tree->lock, flags);
> > +}
>
> What are the worst-case interrupt-off durations here?
Good question. In theory, it could be relatively long, e.g. when there
are lots of DIOs in flight against a range which is locked. I'll do some
measurements to get some idea.
> I note that the new exported functions in this patchset are
> refreshingly free of documentation ;)
They are *so* obvious ;) Point taken... Thanks for review.
Honza
--
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
SUSE Labs, CR
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-02-04 16:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-01-31 21:49 [PATCH 0/6 RFC] Mapping range lock Jan Kara
2013-01-31 21:49 ` [PATCH 1/6] lib: Implement range locks Jan Kara
2013-01-31 23:57 ` Andrew Morton
2013-02-04 16:41 ` Jan Kara [this message]
2013-02-11 5:42 ` Michel Lespinasse
2013-02-11 10:27 ` Jan Kara
2013-02-11 11:03 ` Michel Lespinasse
2013-02-11 12:58 ` Jan Kara
2013-01-31 21:49 ` [PATCH 2/6] fs: Take mapping lock in generic read paths Jan Kara
2013-01-31 23:59 ` Andrew Morton
2013-02-04 12:47 ` Jan Kara
2013-02-08 14:59 ` Jan Kara
2013-01-31 21:49 ` [PATCH 3/6] fs: Provide function to take mapping lock in buffered write path Jan Kara
2013-01-31 21:49 ` [PATCH 4/6] fs: Don't call dio_cleanup() before submitting all bios Jan Kara
2013-01-31 21:49 ` [PATCH 5/6] fs: Take mapping lock during direct IO Jan Kara
2013-01-31 21:49 ` [PATCH 6/6] ext3: Convert ext3 to use mapping lock Jan Kara
2013-02-01 0:07 ` [PATCH 0/6 RFC] Mapping range lock Andrew Morton
2013-02-04 9:29 ` Zheng Liu
2013-02-04 12:38 ` Jan Kara
2013-02-05 23:25 ` Dave Chinner
2013-02-06 19:25 ` Jan Kara
2013-02-07 2:43 ` Dave Chinner
2013-02-07 11:06 ` Jan Kara
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130204164142.GG7523@quack.suse.cz \
--to=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).