From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 1/1] fs/proc: clean up printks
Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2013 15:49:35 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130207154935.f43e8cc8.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1359925185.32609.11.camel@joe-AO722>
On Sun, 03 Feb 2013 12:59:45 -0800
Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-01-31 at 14:20 -0800, akpm@linux-foundation.org wrote:
> > From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> > Subject: fs/proc: clean up printks
> >
> > - use pr_foo() throughout
> >
> > - remove a couple of duplicated KERN_WARNINGs, via WARN(KERN_WARNING "...")
> >
> > - nuke a few warnings which I've never seen happen, ever.
>
> Ignorable trivial comments only:
>
> o Use pr_warn instead of pr_warning
Yeah, I did that in the -fix patch.
> o Consider using "%s: ...", __func__, ...
> instead of "function_name: ...", ...
Too lazy ;)
> o As printk.h is included by kernel.h, and that
> is unlikely to be changed, it's probably not
> useful/necessary to add #include <linux/printk.h>
> anywhere
Too anal.
Failing to explicitly include the stuff you need often causes breakage
when header files are cleaned up, but we're unlikelly to weed printk.h
out of kernel.h.
> o Consider using #define pr_fmt(fmt) where useful
hm, where and how?
> o Consider coalescing formats
out of scope (ie: too lazy)
> o Consider realigning arguments after name changes
Fixed a couple.
--- a/fs/proc/generic.c~fs-proc-clean-up-printks-fix-fix
+++ a/fs/proc/generic.c
@@ -829,8 +829,8 @@ void remove_proc_entry(const char *name,
parent->nlink--;
de->nlink = 0;
WARN(de->subdir, "%s: removing non-empty directory "
- "'%s/%s', leaking at least '%s'\n", __func__,
- de->parent->name, de->name, de->subdir->name);
+ "'%s/%s', leaking at least '%s'\n", __func__,
+ de->parent->name, de->name, de->subdir->name);
pde_put(de);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(remove_proc_entry);
--- a/fs/proc/proc_sysctl.c~fs-proc-clean-up-printks-fix-fix
+++ a/fs/proc/proc_sysctl.c
@@ -997,7 +997,7 @@ static int sysctl_err(const char *path,
vaf.va = &args;
pr_err("sysctl table check failed: %s/%s %pV\n",
- path, table->procname, &vaf);
+ path, table->procname, &vaf);
va_end(args);
return -EINVAL;
_
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-02-07 23:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-01-31 22:20 [patch 1/1] fs/proc: clean up printks akpm
2013-02-03 20:59 ` Joe Perches
2013-02-07 23:49 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130207154935.f43e8cc8.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=joe@perches.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).